this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
213 points (93.8% liked)

Memes

47110 readers
1062 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 minutes ago

I blocked .world because it's a centrist shit hole that serves to do nothing but piss me off with whiners who don't do shit about fuck complaining about tankies and fascists as though their no side taking ass even has a fucking seat at the table.

Fuck .world

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 10 points 3 hours ago

I'm quite deliberately avoiding lemmy.world, so no, we shouldn't just put everything on there.

[–] kplaceholder@lemmy.ml 61 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There was some proposal that I have seen multiple times on Lemmy and at least once on the GitHub repo that communities should be able to subscribe to each other much like users can subscribe to communities. I vastly prefer this to other proposals such as auto-merging communities with the same name, which I can think of a few ways that can go wrong.

It would also be reasonably intuitive for the average user, since following stuff is already a familiar action you take on social media. You wouldn't really need to understand the quirks of federation to know why posting to one community makes it appear on other downstream communities. And as far as I know about ActivityPub (which is admittedly not much), it's not a stretch use it to implement a feature like this.

I wonder if this proposal ever reached anywhere.

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] kplaceholder@lemmy.ml 10 points 14 hours ago

The idea that I'm talking about is actually more like communities forming a network, with chains of following. If I host a new instance and create a memes community in it, I'd like to start having that community follow memes @ lemmy.ml and memes @ lemmy.world, so that the community already has content from the get-go, but users may be able to post memes that are unique to my instance and its followers. The followers would also see memes from upstream unless my community unfollows them, as long as they don't also follow them independently.

This model of the network would allow each community to independently determine which other communities it thematically implies, without the user having to follow all 4 communities with the same name but different content across the platform.

The multireddit suggestion is more like having directories/tags for communities. It wouldn't achieve quite the same thing, but it would be useful as well. Both ideas can coexist and complement each other.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 6 points 14 hours ago

That's a hyperlink. Some new www-stuff which was recently developed in one of our planet's greates research Institutes which also has a great particle collider.

[–] blackberry@midwest.social 19 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

isn't the point of the fediverse to not consolidate?

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

I created an instance for one specific community so that users won't be affected by who federates from who (unless you're a spam instance or something like that)

!dullsters@dullsters.net

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

There're some different ideas in the thread now, basically a fediverse type of consolidation.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Quick! Someone crosspost this to !memes@lemmy.world

[–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 11 points 12 hours ago

but lemmy.ml users are by far funnier and more based

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 37 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Crazy talk. Next you're gonna say we only need one 196 instead of five.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair onehundrednintysix exists because the 196 mods are a bunch of shitlibs, also 19864 exists because tbh I thought it was funny and I still do (also its more left wing)

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 2 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

So if I'm right about this....

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

Also 19864 was originally a subreddit that I used to be very active in and I just wanted it here (the rest is accurate)

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah let's just centralize all of this bullshit.

/s

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

One main community greater than others with the same topic on a decetralized platform ≠ centralization.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, it is one form of centralization; although, I admit, I was twisting the meaning of the term a bit to fit my sarcastic remark.

That being said, as primarily a shitposting lurker who only occasionally actually creates content designed for sharing, I don't mind the extra communities. I'm no stranger to seeing reposts, and I get my kicks from leaving the odd comment that may or may not spawn some sort of rant (usually from myself, not the other parties), but hopefully just tickles someone, and then scrolling to the next. If it's the same thing, I just keep scrollin'.

I could see how it would be irritating to post to multiple communities designed around the same idea, but perhaps the solution is more like turning each community into an aggregate of all similar communities. You could opt your community into a master community, and any post made in one would get shared to all of them.

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So basically this?

I mean I would still like to get rid of the same meme being posted 5 times in 2h...

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

All my homies hate .world and rightfully so.

Moving more communities away from .world is what we should be doing not the other way around.

As others have pointed out, if you try to move to .world people will just riot and make a new community elsewhere. Dont try, its a ridiculously stupid idea.

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Again something the mods have to talk about. It’s something the mods have to discuss about (the community can take part in that discussion too, democracy and stuff). We could for example merge to lemmy.ml.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 28 minutes ago

All my homies hate .ml and rightfully so.

Moving more communities away from .ml is what we should be doing not the other way around.

As others have pointed out, if you try to move to .ml people will just riot and make a new community elsewhere. Dont try, its a ridiculously stupid idea.

[–] finickydesert@lemmy.ml 15 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

no, because not everyone likes to join lemmy.world because of the fedipact.

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 15 hours ago

You don't have to join an instance to participate in their community.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] deus@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There should be a way to see the content from different communities with the same name but from different instances in the same page, like some sort of automatic multireddit. The content would probably be limited to instances federated with your home instance but even then it's something I would like to have.

[–] kplaceholder@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago

You cannot assume that communities with the same name are meant to be on the same topic.

Say I set up an instance focused on discussing parties at home. There are fun in-person games you can play with your friends when many of you are over, so I would create a community c/games for discussing them. Now, what if I want my instance to federate with lemmy.world? They already have a c/games that is dedicated to videogames. Maybe I also would need a community dedicated to videogames, but I'd have to call it c/videogames, because I already have a c/games.

Some human intervention would be required to let the network know that the local c/videogames is the one that has to federate with lemmy.world's c/games, and not the local c/games.

Maybe an automatic suggestion would be fine as a starting point, but it would be more useful that communities themselves could explicitly establish which remote communities they are associated with, without depending on the names.

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

That's actually a pretty idea. I'm imaging something like a tool included into lemmy where you can collect different subs into one folder and even share these/export those folders as xml or json to a new account... And now we're talking about RSS-feeds. Basically.

But RSS-feeds included into lemmy. I don't really know if that would help to get rid of reposts, but it's certainly an interesting idea. Something one would have to integrate in an Lemmy update, so you would need to contribute to the Lemmy code.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I actually love this idea. I'm on a federated service, why do I need to go to 3 meme communities on 3 instances when I could go to "meme" and see all of them?

Crossposts from within the cross-feed could be automatically hidden to avoid showing the same post multiple times, and then we just start spreading the word to crosspost instead of reposting. I think the only issue is that this would definitely be better to implement client-side because AP is just a protocol to move data, whereas this requires checking too many user-defined variables to make it idiomatic easily. I could be wrong though, I don't know the AP code very well

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

It didn’t used to be like this. Maybe take it up with the brave patriot who’s made it his sacred duty to repost ml memes to world, in the hopes of convincing the world admins to defederate from ml. https://lemmy.world/comment/15251475

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Your proposal is much too streamlined.

Perhaps you presume memes are a commodity of which consumption should be maximized!

Nay, I say. Memes are an essential nutrient that becomes toxic in larger doses.

Thus, they must be scattered about in the environment to be encountered by happenstance whilst I pursue my main information foraging goal of finding ad hoc justification for my durable sense of dread.

Memes, uhh, find a way.

Do whatever you want but I am planning many epic shitposts pretty much anywhere I can get a reaction.

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for this detailed reasoning.

[–] besmtt@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Updoot for a great use of the unpopular opinion meme.

[–] Uninvited4586@lemmy.cat 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is that lemmy.world is having federation issues bc they didn't update to last release

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I think they are about to.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Always two there are. And they're both full of reposts.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›