this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
287 points (97.7% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2196 readers
434 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skinnydugan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 1 year ago

Easy answer. It’s not

[–] JuzoInui@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple is one of the most respected recognized brands on the planet. They can encase themselves in concrete and stans will worship the block. They definitely do not need to deal with the PR headache that is Xitter (pronounced ‘shitter’ and rightfully so)

[–] Gamey@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Recognized yes, respected is doubtful tho!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is the difference between CEO and normal people. Normal people see Musk's behavior and divorce themselves immediately. CEOs "wonder" if it's still a good idea.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too much economic control for one person.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, better to have that in the hands of a dozen or so

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree, better to have it in the hands of his workers. Since you know that's where got all his wealth anyways.

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe this was sarcasm

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

May have been. It didn't really read like it.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There are no ethics and morals in business. There’s only profit up or profit down

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Nonsense, plenty of people still use Twitter who should know better. There's just no decent alternative at the moment that doesn't involve either messing with federation or being invite only.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You really have to wonder what’s going on behind the scenes here. Tim knows, the majority of his employees know, that Twitter is a wasteland and not worth spending money on. So why the wishy washy response? Did someone previously sign a contract that’s difficult to get out of or something? Because Apple certainly isn’t gaining anything by advertising on X.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I suppose that by shitting in them publicly he hopes to get others to question the value and so force them to lower their prices - which in turn may give leverage to negotiate better rates on other platforms. That is just my imagination in a nth dimensional chess move thing.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If they simply backed out it would be one article. If they tease for a year its a series of articles.

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Tim Cook: "I wonder how we can get some of that Nazi money without tarnishing our brand..."

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 23 points 1 year ago

It is the ethically incorrect thing to do. But when has ethics ever stopped advertising?

[–] rompe@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

It's not the right thing, it's the far right thing to do.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless Apple is starting its new m3 MacBook Pro, jackboot swastika kid fucker edition, then probably not.

[–] Gamey@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The logical next step after all the child labour editions!

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

If you like advertising to bots and trolls, yes.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey Tim, maybe when Elron Musk comes for the gay, you can make your mind up?

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TIL Tim Cook is gay. 9 years after the fact lol

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes AFAIK he has been open about it from before he became CEO.

But it's not generally a huge issue anyone cares to mention. Except in this situation, I thought it was relevant.

I'm just surprised and find it funny that this is how I found out, a comment on lemmy poking fun at Elon musk destroying Twitter.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You really gotta mess up for the guy who uses child slave labor to want to disassociate.

[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Nah he doesn't care. He's just pretending to care, for the proles.

[–] WillardHerman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are there any computer companies that don’t use child labor?

Lord shit.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope.

That's what happens when there is no meaningful regulation and people continue to vote for it every two years.

[–] WillardHerman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Found this site:

https://knowthechain.org/

Unsure what to make of it.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

Only still advertising because musk started a shaming campaign towards him for “not supporting free speech.”

It’s not like Apple needs the exposure or anything. They could drop Twitter out of their budget with zero consequences.

What are magats gonna do? Burn their iphones?

Oh they are stupid enough to do that?

Good, let them.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I don't understand how that's a question at this point. This point it would be like saying, "I don't know if we can still cater to these Manson family events after all this Helter Skelter business..."

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While everyone wants to be like “duh no” (while like yeah duh). I’m more just thinking how it would still be big. I know plenty of smaller business have but larger ones are still great to see considering dropping it.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's also a business size thing. the bigger your business is, the more you need brand awareness campaigns

<$1MM businesses don't need brand awareness, they need buyer behavior campaigns

>$1B businesses buyer behavior is a mathematical monstrosity, plus brand awareness on top of it

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] SquishPosh@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago