this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
851 points (98.7% liked)

196

4744 readers
157 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 84 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There are people in my family who do this.

Often times, it is just wait 3 minutes and the veil will be lifted the glory of knowledge will be yours.

Other times, it is much worse, they ask the question just after the info was revealed.

I don't often watch movies with them.

[–] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (4 children)

My wife likes to talk during the movies(at home), and doesn't like it when I'm too into the movie to respond to her properly. My solution is to only watch movies with her that I have already watched and liked.

[–] towelie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My partner can't concentrate if I talk at all, but talking (insightful/funny, concise comments at appropriate times) is a pretty normal way my friends and I watched movies growing up. Sucks lol, how am I supposed to just sit on that obvious loop hole or horribly ADR'd line for another hour and a half??

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Oh man it's my time to shine!!

When the ADR is way too obvious | Chris & Jack (2:36) (humor but explains it)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

My wife has a knack for talking over the exact moment that gives the answer as she's asking the question.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

My wife does the same shit. I’m always like “I do not know, I am also watching this movie in the same real time that you are.”

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My wife does the same thing, but she'll also say an hour in "Brad Pitt is in this movie?" "Yes, dear, he's the main character."

[–] oyfrog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You forgot to mention that the movie you're watching is "The Land Before Time"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shapillon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've got some mild form of prosopagnosia (face blindness) and this happens to me all the time.

An actor without a very recognizeable face sporting an unfamiliar haircut? I might recognize them 1h in or never at all.

I really like the movie/serie convention of keeping the same clothes for a character. It helps me a whole lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

she wants to engage with you. you should state your speculations. if you've seen the movie already, just say something utterly outlandish to check if she actually wants to talks to you and not herself

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

My goto response is always "who knows?" Like it's a mystery for the ages, and I'm just as puzzled. That implies I'm just as confused as her and then we can both just keep watching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That partner is an absolute hero. 🙏

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pray for them as they sleep outside tonight.

[–] branno@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have to constantly remind my 5 year old that watching the movie explains the movie.

At least he has the excuse that he’s… ya know… 5

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...while watching The Thing together? ;)

[–] branno@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

He’s very mature for his age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Thing (2012) really could have used a better title (and less cgi), because it isn't a remake. It's a prequel and tells the entire story of why the Norwegians are shooting at the dog in the beginning of The Thing (1982)

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] Astongt615@lemmy.one 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, that reveal at the end (that it's a prequel) is kinda what made the movie worth it for me. Otherwise, knowing that, it's not nearly as enjoyable experience. But more than likely you can watch for free. So, if you like the original, why not?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Damn. The first time I watched the 1982 movie, I watched it with Norwegians. They wanted to be helpful and translated the opening scene. I’m two for two on The Thing spoilers

[–] M137@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's obviously not even close to as good as the '82 one, but it's definitely worth a watch. Just keep your expectations in check, not superb but not seriously bad. There're a lot of interesting videos and articles about the making of it, and how it would have been much better without some changes that were made later in its development, so you get some cool, and sad, extra stuff after watching it.

[–] Tum@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if I remember rightly, they had an entire props department doing the creature in the old-school way, with property and special effects, and decided in editing to replace it with CGI. Really sad. Think of how great modern physical effects could be with the advanced we made since the 80s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Not really. I went to see it back in theatres with a friend, and I remember our agreement was "The Thing influenced Dead Space, and Dead Space influenced 2012 Thing". It's a photocopy of a photocopy. It doesn't have a compelling story to add, and it's not very atmospheric.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I watched them back to back recently. While the original is a cinematic masterpiece. In the remake/prequel you get to look at Mary Elizabeth Winstead for the whole movie, which is always great.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

In which order would it be best to watch them if one has seen neither?

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, that's literally the first line of dialogue uttered in the movie: Se til helvete å komme dere vekk. Det er ikke en bikkje! Det er en slags ting!

[–] dufkm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

In a horrible accent though, at least use an actor that speaks the language or is able to mimic it well enough for a few lines.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, unless it's Mulholland Drive, or The Holy Mountain, or any number of other nonlinear or dream-like or psychedelic films.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Or whatever the fuck Megalopolis was trying to do.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Ain't nobody explaining that shit.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Wow Platinum

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The opposite problem is just as annoying. Someone insisting on explaining everything about the movie as it's happening, and causing me to miss dialogue because they won't shut up. I have eyes, I can watch the movie.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I have an even worse experience that turned me away from ever watching movies with others in the room. Back when movie rentals were a thing and cell phones were new, one of my parents or the other would invariably get called by some random friend or relative, and the movie would be paused while they chatter away for half an hour. That shit continued even in the early days of Netflix. Like, seriously, if you want the family to watch a movie together, TURN OFF YOUR DAMNED PHONE!

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 week ago

They're both instances of people talking when they shouldn't, so I wouldn't call them opposites.

Or did you think the OP post is calling the replier a jerk? No. The point is that the asker is a moron.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I have never encountered this situation. I did not know this was something people did.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I never talk when watching a movie... unless I'm watching it on my own. If I'm on my own I can do the whole "wtf are they doing?" and laugh and swear and pause to get a snack without having to worry about disturbing anyone.

Watching with company can be nice for the shared experience, but watching alone is good for the unencumbered relaxation.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sentence just tickles me the right way:

You watch it - and information is revealed

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

reminds me of the joke:

"that's a real page-turner"

"yeah I know how books work"

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ohh that partner is sleeping in the couch tonight

[–] rippermonty@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

While the people who ask stupid questions still have the whole bed to themselves

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"No fucking shit, Sherlock. The unstated premise of my question was that I was concerned I missed something."

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the opening scene. Unless you walked into the cinema late, you'd know there was nothing to miss. If you do think you've missed something, just keep it to yourself and don't ruin it for other people. You'd be surprised what you can infer from context.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

When I made the post I wasn't aware it was specifically talking about questioning opening scenes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

My wife does this all of the time.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

It is sad to shoot a dog but that dog was not a good boy

[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They weren't shooting at a dog...

load more comments
view more: next ›