this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
425 points (98.4% liked)

World News

40018 readers
2583 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (6 children)

Well, this has been known for decades, the Club or Rome's report (Limits of Growth) predicted this in the 1970s. Here's a graphic from 2004:


We need UBI (Universal Basic Income) or people are going to not be able to afford basic commodities any more. We already see working poor, it's gonna get worse. Demand UBI.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 12 points 21 hours ago

Few people are just going to sit and starve. They will steal food directly or turn to other crimes to get money to buy food.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You know, revolution is not the same as collapse.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

For them it is catastrophic collapse of the stonk market and economy with trillions of wealth evaporating overnight.

For us, it is Tuesday.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

within the next decade?

We're already most of the way there. Inept, Incompetent, and overtly corrupt governments engraging the population homelessness, unemployment, unpopular immigration and costs of necessities going haywire trade wars brewing, Oh, and World War III is basically already in it's pre-game show stage with the fighting in Europe.

I'm at the point where Im expecting it any day. the US is just one bad move away from causing an all out revolt, because part of its population rightly thinks that the new admnistration is full of mobsters, tyrants, and fascists.

[–] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 4 points 22 hours ago

By the way, Trump wonders if Americans will let him treat them like this and continues to do "his business"

[–] AfricanGrey@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Knock knock open up the door it's real!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The participants identified a negative feedback loop, whereby the government’s failure to tax wealth effectively means it lacks sufficient revenue to uphold the social contract by which strong public services, an effective social safety net and a healthy economy provide people with decent living standards.

Trust in politics then declines further, politicians avoid honest discussions of the underlying problems and what to do about them, and the system’s legitimacy is increasingly questioned as the social contract collapses.

That's a nice story, but there's been plenty of even less egalitarian societies. Pretty much all of the ones in written history, actually.

More likely, in the short term a new, more coercive "social contract" will be rotated in (if the trend continues). Heck, we're already seeing it a bit in the US. Now showing fealty to the president is more important than public relations for a lot of companies and billionaires.

[–] ECB@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago

It's hard to imagine, but modern inequality is actually very extreme in historical context

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 7 points 22 hours ago

The ownership class reading this: “…the training wheels are coming off, boys. It’s time we really kick this thing into high gear. We’re running out of time. Get your affairs in order—and by that I mean pick which if your mistresses will be your concubines on your floating golden fortress.”

“Understood.”

The group: “‘we’re the fuckin worst’ on three—one, two, three!

All:

“WE’RE THE FUCKING WORST!”

Generic white guy #1: “Alright, good hustle. Now go out there and fuckin murder some lower class people! This death machine ain’t gonna run itself! lol obviously im kidding, we were born into a machine that already runs itself and we were just the dumb lucky bastards born into the positions we’re in. But we deserve it!

Generic white guy #12: woah, Tom, you thought a little too much there. I’m afraid…we’re gonna have to take away the “#1” from your position. We worked hard to get where we are today! Don’t you EVER suggest there is an inherent flaw in a hierarchical system! You will be punished severely for even MAKING a reference to some FAKE injustice in our system! You are now #4. Other Tom, congratulations, now you’re #1. You must be very proud to hold this position.

Previously Generic white guy #4: this is an honor. I deserve this.

[–] griD@feddit.org 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

$1Trillion dollars wiped off the stock market? NBD, just push the AI more, so we can be free from the labour(ers). So cooked.

That money is just somewhere else.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is why the fascist billionaires are carrying out their great takeover. They know the jig is up and everything's going to crumble down and no one will escape it.

They just want to rob whatever they still can before they too croak. Thre is no great plan for their survival beyond a few years in an underground bunker, either...

[–] SpaghettiYeti@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I got news for you. We can already store food for dozens of years, if not a hundred in mylar bags with O2 absorbers. With enough money you could store enough food for you, security, families, and all supplies to repair and maintain an underground bunker for a lifetime, easily.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s a hilariously incompetent strategy by the rich because they’re more dependent on a functioning society than any other group. You can tell they’re not smart nor good leaders when they build luxury bunkers in New Zealand because those won’t save them from losing virtually (and possibly literally) everything they have. They have everything to lose and the only thing they need to do to keep their wealth and power is to contribute to the society they’re living off of. They’re failing miserably because they lack compassion. It will be their downfall.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is why they are hastily trying to turn the calendar back to 1933 but they might overshoot and get 1789.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just hope nobody does a Napoleon...

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Napoleon was actually about average height for the time. The shortness thing was just British (?) war propaganda to, for lack of a less on the nose term, belittle him in the public consciousness.

Barron IS still freakishly tall, though. He should either stop doing that or become really good at basketball or volleyball.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Not to go off on a quite wild tangent from societal collapse but I think beyond propaganda Napoleon was often flanked by tall and hand-picked elite guards and ironically also old aristocracy generals themselves tall from richer diet and so appeared short in comparison.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elon literally built a doomsday retreat in Texas, where most of the women he's fathered children live. as well as most of his children.
some notable exceptions, Grimes isnt there, nor the child who became Trans. for obvious reasons

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I didn't realize he was in the flds

[–] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

"Boris Johnson with his Russian connections and Brexit is innocent, if you think he is..."

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

"within the next decade" sounds like an unnecessarily long view on it. Next Christmas will come within the next decade too but it doesn't mean it'll be 10 years from now.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I can think of a couple of ways to fix that.

[–] AfricanGrey@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In before lemmy.world bootlickers delete these comments for "inciting violance."

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How is a wealth tax violence?

[–] AfricanGrey@lemmy.zip 3 points 22 hours ago
[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Already there.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not really, given the current state of the world, it would most likely accelerate the rise of fascism, war and the further environmental destruction of the planet.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah you only need to look at post world war 1 Germany to see how that works out. Or post USSR Russia. It’s fascism that rises to the top.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure that's the aim of most accelerationists

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago

Pretty much, you know what you'll lose but not what you'll get. A societal collapse would lead to a massive power vacuum that could lead both ways, but I'm not optimistic for a good outcome...

I'd agree if it was just the oppressive system and the power and wealth of those benefitting the most from it collapsing with no ripple effects, but the most vulnerable groups of people will take the brunt of the initial damage long before the billionaires feel it.

A shitload of innocent people are going to die from the devastation wrought by a few billionaires and the politicians they own. Even more so than today.

load more comments
view more: next ›