this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

516 readers
243 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

~PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!~

  1. Be nice and no bigotry/prejudice
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned
  3. Stay on topic
  4. Don't promote proprietary software
  5. No crypto
  6. No Xitter links (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
  7. If you post news exclusive to a country please name it. ~(This isn't a bannable rule, just a recommendation!)~

Related communities

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

After the original mod being inactive for so long, i've asked the db0 mods for me to take this community. So, welcome back!

Rules

This includes the instance rules of dbzer0, which can be tl;dr'd to: no right wing nutjobs or tankies are allowed. As for the community rules:

  1. Be nice
  2. No bigotry/prejudice
  3. No tankies/right wingers
  4. Don't promote proprietary software
  5. Stay on topic
  6. No crypto
  7. Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
  8. If you post news exclusive to a country please name it. (This isn't a bannable rule, but just a recommendation :) )

Why not:

Lemmy.ml

.ml is infamous for banning pretty much anyone they please. This community, while left libertarian, will allow conflicting viewpoints.

Lemmy.world

.world is too big, and has centralized a decentralized community. It simply does not fit, and is a net negative for the fediverse as a whole.


I will be creating a wiki/guide for this community later on, but i'm currently busy.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fxomt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Its been decided, hexbear users will be allowed, but only if they behave.

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Was just checking back on here, good choice, if it doesn't get bad, no further fragmentation :)

If it does get bad, this can always be reverted

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Banning by instance achieves nothing but further alienation.

Let them be, just don't hesitate to ban those who poison the conversation.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago

+1 to this.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for stepping in!

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Regarding rule 3, what about things like VPN and email services that have proprietary components?

[–] fxomt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exceptions may be made, such as source available/some proprietary components but promoting completely proprietary software is not allowed

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 week ago

Mullvad has wireguard, and a open source client but the backend code is closed source. Would that be allowed?

Is there anything in privacy guides that wouldn't be allowed?

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sounds like one of those internet-only words from people who are socially crippled and live exclusively on the internet and not enough time outside meeting atrangers to socialize

[–] fxomt@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a real term dating back to 1956, and it's a bannable offense by instance rules.

The instance's rules are:

  • Nothing positive or promoting cryptocurrency, blockchain or NFTs
  • Nothing extreme-right-wing. This includes conspiracy theories, SovCit, Pro-Police, AnCaps etc. We’ll know it when I see it, don’t test us!
  • No anti-science topics.
  • No Tankie shit.
  • No TERFs.
  • No Porn.
[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 1 week ago

It sounds like essentially "Do not post anything that expresses a different opinion." and the "No anti-science topics" sounds like "Do not post documentation that proves our belief is false or wrong."

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for your service, Sir!!!!

.ml was robust community when I joined, but I have a feeling that constant banning of talent really hurtnthe discourse.

I am hoping we can pick up these discussions here on current best practice.

Remember folks, deny the corporate parasite engagement and profit 🐸