this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55809 readers
454 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm spinning up a new seedbox and wanted to know what is everyone using nowadays? I was using deluge via the thick client and rutorrent previously. Are they still king? edit: I should have also mentioned that I plan on running this server headless so I will need to be able to access it via a thin client or a web browser

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] monstoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 83 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 15 points 1 week ago

+1 for qBittorrent. I used to be a Deluge fan, but qBittorrent seems more performant and feature-packed.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Still qbittorrent. Docker container with web UI makes it trivial.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 week ago

qBittorrent and rtorrent are very popular.

[–] TypicalHog@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] thagoat@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago

I like that they were using ALL CAPS and you're using all lowercase.

qBittorrent

[–] TypicalHog@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

At least there's one thing these Lemmy people agree with me on.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

qBittorrent is probably the most commonly used client. Transmission is another popular option, especially among macOS users, since it has a familiar design and feels more native.

rTorrent is great if you want a CLI app, and ruTorrent offers a web frontend. Another option that you can run on a server is Deluge.

You can control qBittorrent from Android using qBitController or from iOS using qBitControl (you can get it from AltStore after adding the Michael-128 repo). Transdroid supports other clients as well, and it's my personal favorite. If you want to torrent on the Android device itself, check out LibreTorrent. For iOS, use iTorrent (also available on AltStore).

If you already plan on self-hosting, or have root access on your seed box (or some other way of installing applications/deploying Docker containers), I also recommend setting up bitmagnet. It's basically your own torrent indexer and search engine. It can also integrate with your *arr applications.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Transmission is my favorite design-wise on macOS but I wish it had i2p support.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I never even realized that Transmission doesn't support it. I just have I2P set up on my seedbox (but it typically requires root access, so unfortunately not everyone can replicate this). I would imagine it's pretty flaky on macOS though? I'm pretty sure the vast majority of I2P users run Linux, so the macOS client probably doesn't get as much development and attention.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Deluge always seems so underrepresented, but as far as I know it's never had a version compromised with malware like some of the other popular clients. It also performs great when you are seeding over 1000 torrents as long as you upgrade to version two.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Better to use the underrepresented torrent clients. They have the least chance of enshittification.

looks at µTorrent

[–] bikooo2@r.nf 12 points 1 week ago

Qbittorrent, Transmission and Ktorrent the Last two When some updates breaks Qbittorrent

[–] lindicks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

arch-qbittorrentvpn docker container, because it was the easiest to set up on my TrueNAS home server.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

qBittorrent. With a quick UI switch to vuetorrent for the tablet. LXC bound to a bridge thats VPN connected.

[–] Xianshi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

The is the way

[–] radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Qbittorrent via a container and web UI on my NAS, lets me use it as a backend for *arrs as well as anything else, just have tag based directories for it so Software goes into one folder and TV movies etc in their respective folders.

I personally like the setup a lot since I can always be a seeder even well after my ratio is hit.

slskd hooked up to this as well to share everything music wise, gives me a nice way to reconcile stuff Lidarr can't find and shares it all back for anyone to browse so hopefully helps someone downloadv something they're searching for a FLAC of

nzb360 on Android for management as needed, it hooks into Qbittorrent easily and gives me a nice place to do some quicker tasks for my overall infra

[–] carp1@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’ve been using Transmission for many years.

[–] nfms@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I've got Transmission on my NAS and use Transmission-remote(Linux and android) for the client. Simple, easy to setup and it just works.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

iblocklist and transmission name a better team

[–] kirby@feddit.it 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)

Random semi-related thought. I'm going through the comparison of BitTorrent clients page on Wikipedia and it's amazing how many clients end up as Adware.

[–] Xed@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

I’m currently using Transmission again

[–] spokendotcpp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago
[–] hyacin@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

transmission in docker container on NAS, with dedicated IP that gets forced through VPN on my router

[–] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

qBittorent for Windows and LibreTorrent for Android.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

qbittorrent on PC and libretorrent on Android.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm a much bigger fan of the deluge thin client, personally.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hear people use the search function of QBitTorrent tied to VPN tunnel. Basic, but it works

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 4 points 1 week ago

transmission

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used transmission for years, but the larger my library got the more issues I had. Currently using Qbit and loving the categories for easier management, especially with the *arr suite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

On a headless seedbox Deluge/ruTorrent/Transmission are still reliable, most of the paid seedbox services still default with those.

qBittorrent is hugely popular on the desktop front and has been getting more popular as a headless client now that the web ui has improved, also look into qbittorrent-nox if you don't have a gui to do initial setup with.

[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I keep recommending Tribler and I don't know why it's not more popular. Anything wrong with it?

[–] megaman@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I appreciate the ability for the tor-like layered routing with tribler. Getting the headless UI set up is annoying, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grostleton@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

qbit on pc, flud on android

[–] EpicStuff@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I use biglybt, i know the ui isn't great but the features make up for it

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Good ol' rtorrent never dissapoints. For when I want something with a webui, I have a qflood container that I extracted from its old *arr setup to more generalistic usage.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've had a poor experience with Deluge, a bug report completely disregarded years ago as I wasn't able to provide (very technical) details to the developers without some assistance, which they smugly refused to provide (I don't act entitled). I then stumbled upon a post where one of them discussed the reason why they wouldn't add workarounds in the installer as qBittorrent did (firewall exception and a couple of other things I can't recall right now), their reasoning and their wording struck me as strongly ideological, and it made me uneasy. I've had a similar experience with Affinity developers who (again, by way of ideology) refused to add an "interface scale" parameter to their programs, adamant on letting the OS handle the scaling, even though I couldn't change my OS scale because it messed up other programs. Their response was "it's the other program's fault". Very helpful. 👍🏼

Anyway, I was trying to say I don't like Deluge. To answer your question I know it runs via a variety of interfaces so I wouldn't be surprised it's your best bet. I personally use qBittorrent .

load more comments
view more: next ›