this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
26 points (88.2% liked)

Science

13435 readers
60 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think I have ever seen gravity described as strong before. The whole Earth is pulling me down yet I can jump

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An elephant can jump higher than a house

[–] Kyuuketsuki@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Statement false; neither can jump at all.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

But if you get one high enough it might start to believe that it can.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Agreed, I'm going to have to see the numbers on that. I don't believe the gravitational attraction of an ice sheet on land would have the effect he's talking about. It's a measurable effect for sure, but the rise from the extra water, land rebound and warming is a much much bigger effect.

He's trying to convince the Dutch not to worry about Greenland? Wtf for? It's one planet my dude, if Greenland melts other places are going to melt as well. Who cares what ice contributes the most? Lot of good that's going to do when your house is below water.

We should be worried about climate change and we should be acting to counteract it. Going around with these nonsense theories doesn't help one bit, even if they are correct which I highly doubt. It just confuses the story, where we require clarity.

Checked other sources: the effect he is talking about causes a local rise of only 1 to 2cm max and isn't even measurable out to 1000km. So 30 meters over 2000km is pure bullshit.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Compare and contrast to the number of metres predicted by 2100 from melted ice and thermal expansion

[–] danstafford@nerdculture.de 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

What are you trying to say? Look at this weird unknown YouTuber who talks nonsense and has 100 views? OK I have seen him, I think 100 views it too much views in my opinion.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if Pangaea, Gondwana and Laurasia are remnants of repeated climate change along with plate tectonics.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, absolutely they they are. They're products of a changing system, and here we are.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

...for now, anyway.

[–] isgleas@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

...but we weren't