13
submitted 1 year ago by talos@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Seems like it's profit squeezin season on every major platform.

[-] donio@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

When you have a goose that produces a reliable daily supply of golden eggs do you:

  1. keep collecting your daily egg
    or
  2. see if giving it a good kick or two gets you more eggs
[-] Zifnab25@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

As YouTube increases the number and length of ads, the amount of traffic behind blockers rises accordingly.

This is also just... a function of the evolving digital space. The consolidation of the internet ownership sphere and the modernized APIs/coding tools afford server-side content warehouses more and more power over what the end user receives.

Because AWS owns all the fucking rack space, because ISP monopolies are the defining feature of western net access, and Microsoft force-feeds people their proprietary interfaces, we're moving away from the point where clients control what they display and closer to the point where everything's just a dumb-terminal for big business.

We're effectively backpeddling from Web 2.0 to Terrestrial TV.

[-] Link@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Youtube most likely never made any money. Hosting these vast amounts of video is expensive. Google stopped telling us how much they money youtube made them lose. You would think they would start bragging when they could make a profit off of it.

That being said, this still sucks of course.

[-] naoseiquemsou@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Although they don't profit directly from youtube, it's a strategy they take to impede competition from arising and keeping their name as the main one. It's the kind of strategy only multibillionaire companies can do, and, in my opinion, something that should be restricted, because it affects smaller businesses to the point of becoming inviable.

[-] Zifnab25@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

More notably, its a strategy they can do when borrowing costs are functionally zero.

A lot of this shit is just the consequence of Fed Rate Policy. No more cheap money means these loss leaders are actually being expected to generate profit, not to just act as clearing houses for propaganda.

[-] nigh7y@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

They have really gone all out on the whole enshittification process during the past couple of years, haven’t they?

[-] waspentalive@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

As fill-in ads are a vector for computer viruses and other malware I for one will NOT be disabling my ad blocker unless YouTube is willing to provide a lifetime subscription to something like Life Lock and make me whole for anything lost to whatever malware arrives as a part of an ad.

Where else can I watch sci-show, Linus-tech-tips, and all the other channels I subscribe to?

[-] beatniak@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Just use newpipe. It's youtube without the ads. Doesn't have casting support, but it allows you to download the videos. You can also listen/download to the audio of videos, without fetching the video.

[-] blank_sl8@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Newpipe will probably be blocked as well if youtube is doing this. Honestly not sure why youtube hasn't blocked yt-dlp and others already.

[-] KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

It's not easily block able as it scrapes the YouTube website. They'd have to stop having a website for that to happen.

[-] asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Honestly curious if they'd ever consider that, considering how popular watching youtube on the phone is, so I could see them trying to get even desktop users to use an app to prevent 3rd party launchers

If they did though, it would probably cause at least a decent number of people to try to find alternatives

At the end of the day, the main way the fediverse gets new users is the big tech companies screwing up

[-] KindnessInfinity@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

More for fedi :)

[-] Unsigned@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

We're getting closer to the prophetic 4chan post

[-] LostCause@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

When will companies finally understand that some people won‘t watch ads no matter what tricks they employ. I‘d rather watch no video at all than a single ad. If that is their goal, fine.

[-] SuperZutsuki@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

And the percentage of people using ad blocking has to be crazy low. I've never seen another person in public with ad blocking. Every time I happen to see someone watching youtube, there's ads playing.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You can watch any YouTube video on Invidious, Peertube is a federated alternative to Youtube, Odysee is a blockchain based Youtube alternative that kicks back to creators and users, and many creators use Nebula as a subscription platform that directly pays them.

[-] manned_meatball@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

oh boy, I wish youtube kills itself like reddit is doing right now so decentralized alternatives can become widely adopted

[-] authed@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised it took them this long

[-] BruceBanner@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[-] dan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Then I’m going to begin not fucking watching YouTube.

[-] veloxization@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago

The tricks YT doesn't want you knowing about...

NewPipe

Piped

Invidious

[-] champion@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] kadu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There is a federated version of YouTube...

But storing video is a massive challenge, way harder than dealing with a Lemmy or Mastodon instance.

[-] dan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My rational mind realises it’s such an expensive system to run that it’s reasonable for them to charge or show ads. The problem is they’ve been extremely aggressive with ads and pushing subscriptions, to the point where I’m pretty resentful of the idea. Plus they’ve neglected so many things (like allowing aggressive copyright predators and refusing to implement sensible human-based appeals processes) that they really should have dealt with and instead embraced an algorithm that I’m pretty sure is at least partially responsible for the radicalisation of large groups of people.

I.. don’t mind paying for shit. I just don’t want to give them money.

Also: wow there’s federated video sharing? Bet that’s not cheap to run.

[-] vividspecter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Also: wow there’s federated video sharing? Bet that’s not cheap to run.

It's called PeerTube for the record.

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

even google is having difficulty storing video.

[-] psysok@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I pay for a youtube premium family plan. Best money I spend monthly. I want to support the youtube creators that I watch, I don't have to see ads (I block them anyway), and I get a music service included.

[-] authed@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Does any of that money really goes to creators?

[-] psysok@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I do not have first hand knowledge, but I have heard that premium viewers are much more valuable to a channel than ad supported views. I also support channels I enjoy through Patreon as well. I would much rather pay and be a customer than do "free" services where my info is just the product for corporations.

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

revanue from yt premium views is like 1000x from ad views. that's probably only going to get larger.

if you dont believe in paying for your media then you give power to the advertisers.

[-] Richardisaguy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, good luck making me watch ads trough newpipe

[-] SuperHumanNot@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

YouTube demands NewPipe to pay $1b...

Haha

[-] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

I feel like extensions are pretty savvy for fixing this. If not, I will waste less time on YouTube. Hell, why not another big site getting over my limit for hoops that are worth jumping through vs value I get.

[-] sacredbirdman@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Yup, a lot of my time got wasted on YouTube.. I watched "educational" and "interesting" videos but I have to say that many of the creators got caught into enshittification process too.. I would do well with 95% reduction in watch time. However, if they start a real war against adblockers.. 100% reduction will it be.

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The 10min minimum is why I pretty much stopped posting. If you don't provide enough viewing time for 2 pre-rolls and one intermission your revenue per 1k views drops off and you don't get promoted to new viewers.

I actually do not understand the widespread hostility that people have toward this kind of thing. I watch a lot of content on YouTube, and I don't want to see ads, so I pay for premium. I watch a lot of content on Twitch, and I don't want to see ads, so I pay for turbo. Hosting a major video streaming website isn't cheap. It's not like these things are unreasonably priced. If you hate the ads so much, then why not pay for the service that the platform is offering you, and for the content that creators are providing on it? And if you don't watch often enough for ad-free viewing to be worth a few bucks a month to you, then why get so worked up about having to sit through an ad every now and then?

[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I can't speak for everyone, but I block ads and don't pay because I hate Google. In addition to their repeated violations of user privacy, they go out of their way to disable OS features unless you pay them. Like disabling background play or PiP with Safari on iOS. Those features use the same open standards as foreground web browsers, so it literally takes extra effort to break them. Effort that could instead be used to fix the numerous problems with their platform, which they don't. I refuse to reward that behaviour.

[-] LostCause@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate ads with a passion due to my experiences in the marketing industry and will go out of my way to never watch any. I also don’t want to pay for random internet content, especially not to companies on the stock market. (Though I do use Patreon a bit for some content creators)

Can‘t explain it much more than that. If youtube locks me out due to that, so be it. I don‘t get worked up either, I simply state my opinion on it where I please and if I‘m not wanted I leave. That‘s about it.

[-] beached@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I hate ads. They are annoying, and waste too much of my time, are irrelevant to me 90% of the time, and often can be malicious.

I would like to watch videos on youtube, but I dont wish to watch videos on youtube if there are ads. Also, ads are not every now and again, they are 2 ads for every video without fail now. 2x 30s ads for a 5 minute video is as bad as cable, I ditched cable and replaced it with youtube.

[-] foxuin@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

And if you don’t watch often enough for ad-free viewing to be worth a few bucks a month to you, then why get so worked up about having to sit through an ad every now and then?

There is an awkward gap where most services (not just YouTube) don't offer reasonable pricing for consuming small amounts of content. So if you consume a lot of YouTube, the subscription price is justified. If you consume very little YouTube, you can probably suffer through some ads. But if you're somewhere in the middle, there isn't a great option.

YouTube probably makes fractions of a cent off of ads on a single video it shows me, but I can't pay fractions of a cent to watch one video.

I'd consider this to actually be a pretty widespread problem across the internet, where it's frustratingly difficult to buy small amounts of content for a reasonable price. It's either the subscription or nothing for a ton of services.

[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

We did the Twitter to Mastodon migration. Now we are doing the Reddit to Lemmy/kbin migration. When are we doing the YouTube to Peertube migration?

[-] liberatedGuy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

That's impossible or at least very difficult, right now. Video content is very expensive. LBRY is the only feasible option.

[-] adonkeystomple@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

As irritating as it is. I do understand. The internet and things on the internet can’t just be free, and ads is how we pay.

I do highly disagree with how many ads they’ve been playing with implementing.

[-] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It is not just the quantity, but the quality of ads.

Users would not be so concerned if they employed banner ads instead of 5 minute long ads which just force you to sit and wait for a 5 second video.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
13 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

34441 readers
308 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS