this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
770 points (98.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3523 readers
4 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpicyPeaSoup@kbin.social 99 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you leak sensitive military documents just because you can't stand losing an online argument, your voting rights and driving licence should be revoked. You are simply too stupid to exist in normal society.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Treating people as sub-human - no longer with the same basic human rights, like the right to vote, as others - just for committing a crime, is an extremely dangerous fascist road to go down.

Criminals exist, they are people, and they have as much right to take part in the democratic process as anybody else. Equality is the cornerstone of democracy.

[–] GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only exception I would make to this is cases of electoral fraud. If you are part of an attempt to manipulate the votes you should lose the right to vote.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Some countries other than the USA that have criminal disenfranchisement laws have them ONLY for crimes targeting the state/democratic order. As of 2012, Germany, Norway and Portugal are doing this. Though most countries just let their criminals vote.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

criminals exist

hallo

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I agree with you. Did you know that criminal disenfranchisement is not an invention of the USA? We turned it into an artform, to be sure, but it has a long history and is still a thing in many other countries (old article, couldn't find anything more recent easily).

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a criminal offence. In a US wystem, that means no voting, driving of much of anyrhing else for around two decades.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

No no you don't understand

They leak online documents because its usually Gaijin's braindead mods rambling about superior russian technology that gets implemented as invincible in game lol.

Also pretty much all these leaks are considered sensitive info, not top secret. It's not common on the internet, but really easy for many people in the military to access because its usually basic things like a flight manual.

Not to mention its also mostly retired or previous generation tech, so this material is probably coming from off service members anyway.

Hell even the China MBT "leak" wasn't illegal because it was already declassified.

It's not my fault that people are wrong on the internet

[–] GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Voting rights should only be impacted in cases of electoral fraud. If you are part of a widespread campaign to illegally impact the vote then and only then should you lose voting rights

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Skua@kbin.social 103 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Engine and sensor specs for the F-117

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I was in the Navy, during the mid 90's, I watched these things take off and do training tests or whatever they did. We watched them for hours. It occurred to me, watching them in perfect daylight and with a understanding of what I was watching, that if I didn't know what that was it could have easily been a UFO. And ever since then when someone tells me that they might have seen a UFO I tell them about watching that airplane and how UFO it looked taking off and doing maneuvers. Its shape and speed make it such a bizarre thing to see.

[–] 100@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I saw some jet in 2010 at an airshow in Spangdahlem, pretty sure it was an F-22, transition from flying normally to what can only be described as standing on it's engines and flying through the air, horizontally, belly first. Evidently this was easy enough to be performed directly over the base at a very low altitude. Mindblowing.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"Easy enough"... but wasn't there a case where a pilot lost control doing that stunt, and the plane turned into a fireball just off-base?

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

This is teaching and maintaining standards of NCD leadership, rightchyah

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wasn't that retired from combat in 2008? I get that the technology might still be classified, but by modern stealth, it's ancient

[–] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was ITAR restricted and not sensitive. Every time I see this I just shake my head..

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I thought. It's been 8+ years since I had to do anything ITAR so I couldn't remember if it also applied to information. From what I remember it explicitly controls products that are purpose built or components of defense systems (and by that I mean 'Arms').

While I'm sure Warthunder thought the best idea was to say "fuck that, we aren't touching this live wire with a 20 foot long insulated fiber glass pole" and the manual itself is export controlled (as it aids in use of the F-117 system) there isn't a new national security threat because of it being shared publicly. Part of the reason ITAR exists, if you make it difficult or impossible to obtain all the parts of a system, that system is going to have a hard time working correctly.

[–] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

NATO sells the docs online lmao

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anyone happen to have the specific persons handbook on how to operate a m1 Abrams?

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

WHY ARE THEYRE SIX PEDALS!

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

If there are only four directions

[–] tristar@lemmyfly.org 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Classified information or $10 manual again?

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Other people have said it's a ten dollar manual but I never checked the sources 🤷

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/the-war-thunder-forum-has-once-again-been-used-to-share-restricted-plane-documentation-this-time-about-the-f-117-nighthawk/ar-AA1gAVs9

the user allegedly posted pages from a flight manual, which included information such as the location of the plane’s sensors, its engine specifications, and even its firing angles.

Probably nothing new to the people who would target an F-117 but still

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wasabi@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] vaalla@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

F-117 documents were leaked on War Thunder forums this week i think.

[–] PinkOwls@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

As a life-long fan of the F-117 (I played the F-19 and F-117 games by Microprose), was there anything of interest in those documents? Asking for a friend.

It's another flight manual like the Eurofighter DA.7 last week (iirc).

[–] PickTheStick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh man, you played too? There's dozens of us!

I remember having to learn how to use DOS commands to load the cd and start the game.

[–] PinkOwls@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back then it was on floppy disks!

I played the F-117 game on DosBox a few years ago, settings to full realism/full difficulty and it was surprisingly easy. I also really miss the Microprose-style UIs in modern games, only few game developers put the work into making an immersive UI (one such positive example is the game "Highfleet").

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah get a load of that guy with his fancy CDs.

Mine was 5.25” floppies. (F19)

I’ve never tried it on an emu because I figured I don’t have the manual so I wouldn’t know what all the keys did :(

Was Tank Platoon also microprose? That game was awesome too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So many times over the years. The devs had made multiple public statements that they will not use the information or implement it in game, so as not to encourage it, yet people keep doing it

[–] SiffaGroove@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The information being used in the game is FAR less important than being right on a Internet forum, apparently

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This time its not even to win an argument the comment is just "here's the flight manual, please implement the plane"

Which is even worse than what you'd think because the plane looks very cool but its purpose is nowhere near the type of gameplay that war thunder has.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Such a strange time to be alive

load more comments
view more: next ›