this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
1025 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

60350 readers
4745 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i think I've finally reached peak zuckerberg, i don't want to read one more thing about facebook or meta or whatever

[–] FeloniousPunk@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

Same. Luckily you can add his name to the block list.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is going to be bare ass naked running down the halls screaming for employees to "come at me bro"

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not glad that someone stood up for the billionaire.

But good for you ?

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I aint standing up for him just pointing out hes been trained to fight by professionals. Ohh and hes won competitions for it.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yeah people drastically underestimate the gulf between randos and anybody who's had even a little decent training.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you have a problem with it, organize a Facebook union. The only way small voices matter to CEOs are when they speak collectively.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

if they weren't already organizing, I bet they are now. CWA has been receiving so many high quality leads for the last 2 years that they literally do not have enough dues-paying members to fund all of those campaigns. They're one of the largest unions in the US already.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good to know that there’s still some decent people there.

Anyone 'decent' there is a wage-slave that doesn't have an out. If you can leave meta and don't there's no decency there.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 0 points 20 hours ago

announced content moderation changes that will allow users to say that LGBTQ+ people have “mental illness,”

Someone gets triggered by free speech here.

Anyway, wind blows the other way now. Zuck doesn't want to piss against it

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think community notes is a better form of moderation. And focusing on stopping the more extreme bad shit instead of thought crimes seems like a good thing too.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

who is talking about thought crime? spreading fake news can be dangerous in a way that results in actual deaths.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"In modern usage, the term "thought crime" is often used metaphorically to describe situations where individuals are penalised or ostracised for holding unapproved or unpopular opinions, or for expressing dissenting views." - dr gpt

Seems to fit pretry perfectly

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the context of trans people, anti trans rhetoric goes away beyond "unapproved" or "unpopular" though. It's straight up non-factual pseudoscience at best. A lot of it is straight up lies and libel/slander. It does real, lasting harm. That's not "thought crime" as you describe.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That exactly fits my definition. My definition says nothing about outcomes or if its true or not my definition is simply about expressing an opinion and you disliking it is proving me right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

thats different from fake news, still

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Please define "fake news" and dont say news that isnt true because then u have to decide who chooses what is objective reality.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 23 hours ago

For all the crap on X, the Community Notes I've seen have been actually kinda good. Not that I've seen a lot, because algorithmically sorted public microblogging is still discursive cancer with ideological hepatitis that I mostly try to avoid.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›