this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
1448 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

46024 readers
1853 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 29 points 3 days ago

Yes exactly.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (33 children)

You can be fine with the innovation and entrepreneurial spirit of capitalism and still favor a wealth cap and abolishing laws like Citizens United that give money undue influence on politics. Extreme wealth concentration actually hurts capitalism by starving the spending economy of money. It's a defect in the system that eventually spoils the system.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's partially because like many other words and names (just consider Isis, an important goddess of ancient egypt), "socialism" to most people means the type of absolute control that communist countries usually feature. But of course, as a word/concept, socialism is just the application of socialist policies, not even remotely alluding to some absolute end goal or so. And naturally as a part of society except a tiny minority at the top, most people would benefit from more socialist policies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›