this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
16 points (76.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

30017 readers
792 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Yeah, the whole Flat Earth stuff is a relative modern re-occurrence.

We've had concrete evidence of a globe Earth and a pretty accurate measurement of the circumference since the 3rd century BC (Erastothenes). ¹
Heliocentrism was theorized by the Ancient Greeks, but we've only had concrete evidence/math since the 16th century (Copernicus). ²

Then in the 19th century, you had the writer Washington Irving who wrote a romanticized biography of Columbus and claimed that folks in the Middle Ages believed the Earth to be flat, which was just not true. ³

And then there was Samuel Rowbotham, another writer who just made up a whole load of bullshit and kind of brought the conspiracy theories underway. ⁴

¹: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth
²: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism
³: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_the_flat_Earth#Irving's_biography_of_Columbus
⁴: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Rowbotham

[–] Metostopholes@midwest.social 32 points 1 day ago

I mean, they kinda do. All the flat earth models I've seen have a tiny sun going around in a circle above the disc.

[–] UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

well, to be fair, we can see the same amount of stuff in every direction without an edge. and at the rate of expansion, we could never reach the 'edge' we can currently see. so we kinda are at the centre of the universe

[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I think the problematic part of ~~heliocentrism~~ geocentrism is more "the sun is rotating around the earth" rather than "we are at the center of universe"

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

heliocentrism is not about the sun rotating around the earth. The heliocentric model puts the sun at the center, and everything rotating around it.

[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Oh yes, Im dumb sorry I meant geocentrism but just used the word written above x)

[–] viking@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never come across anyone who believed in heliocentrism, ever. Is that a thing?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Some public schools and so-called 'experts' try to tell us the earth and other planets orbit around the sun. But anyone can see with the naked eye that the planets don't change brightness, even though their distance from the earth would vary vastly under this crazy heliocentric model! Fake science!