this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
54 points (95.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
10 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New research shows what happens when cities add sidewalks and take other pedestrian-friendly steps.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

a new study in the American Journal of Epidemiology used 11,000 twins to show that whenever a neighborhood becomes 1 percent more walkable [...] residents walk 0.42 percent more minutes a week. So if a city boosts an area’s walkability by about 50 percent, an average resident might theoretically walk about 20 more minutes a week, according to the study.

I feel like there has to be a tipping point after which increases in walkability lead to much larger increases in minutes walked. It's not surprising that a 1% increase in walkability only leads to 0.42 percent more minutes of walking, because that's just a small tweak to an overall car-dominated hell. It seems like 50% more walkable would pass a threshold, making it safe and even enjoyable to walk.

In fact, there are plenty of anecdotes to that effect. It's great to see hard data like this; let's hope for more.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

whenever a neighborhood becomes 1 percent more walkable

I can already see carbrains and NIMBYs argue against that 1% improvement, despite the massive benefits to individuals and communities.

Ideally, neighbourhoods should be 100% walkable when they are developed, and if there's no impact to safety or walkability, then the idea of introducing car traffic should be considered.

The way we work now, walkability is either an afterthought or simply not a consideration at all, and that hurts everyone.