Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
Well, it only makes those even dumber who eat this stuff, anyway. Normal people are not affected.
Apparently, lead bullets don’t just contaminate the animal that was shot. If the animal escapes after being shot, it could enter the food chain and affect other animals when they consume it. Additionally, there are animals that mistake spent lead bullets (that never made its mark) for food and end up consuming the lead bullet, thereby becoming contaminated. (Source)
As of 2023, lead bullets were banned in certain national wildlife areas. (Source)
However, the National Rifle Association (NRA) is actively opposing this ban. A quick search for “lead bullet ban” will provide an overview of their arguments. I prefer not to provide a link to their website to avoid inadvertently boosting their traffic. Essentially, their argument, as I understand it, is rooted in socioeconomic factors. Lead bullets and fishing weights are inexpensive, making them accessible to individuals with limited financial resources. They also deny the current scientific evidence supporting the ban. But, the research shared by OP should help build facts against their denial.
Don’t be like RFK jr
I looked into this a while back, and found that the main reason for an increase in lead began when smokeless, high velocity bullets displaced the 'big and slow' bullets of the blackpowder era.
The high velocity rounds go so fast, the bullets break up and spray an ultra fine lead shrapnel further into the muscle around the actual wound cavity, requiring that more of the meat near the wound be cut away and wasted to avoid the contaminated parts. In contrast, older slow bullets stay almost fully intact, meaning the surrounding meat can be cut very close to the wound without fear of contamination.
Most hunters either aren't aware of this fact, or if they are, dismiss it so as not to be seen as a 'lesser man'.
Nowadays there are solutions to this problem in the form of all-copper bullets for rifles, and steel shot for shotguns, which don't use any lead in their construction.
In addition to the bullets themselves, the primer that disperses in your face has lead too. There's a nice graphic here: https://projects.seattletimes.com/2014/loaded-with-lead/1/
The takeaway for me is that 1.2% of the participants eat roadkill.
Or trap rather than shoot.
Trapping rabbits used to be pretty popular in some areas of the country. It probably still is.
Careful review of butchering practices and monitoring of meat-packing processes may decrease lead exposure from wild game consumption.
So would just using steel shot, which is already a federal requirement for waterfowl hunting. (Or at least using nontoxic, non-lead shot is. Steel shot is just the most common.)
Another reason to never partake in hunting.