this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
381 points (93.6% liked)

196

16724 readers
2427 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Poots@mander.xyz 85 points 1 week ago (1 children)

WHY IS THE TITLE CENSORED!? THIS IS THE INTERNET - YOU CAN SAY RULE , LOSER!

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is annoying though. Fuck.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

My problem isn't if you post OC that you censored, my problem is when people are posting another's OC that didn't censor any cuss words.

Like if you're reposting a 4-panel comic here that explicitly had cuss words and then you censored it. FUCK THAT.

Same applies to reposting a tweet or whatever.

Tl;Dr If you're posting something that already has uncensored cuss words in it, stop being a bitch and censoring shit.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I understand the assignment boss.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I never really understood why people self censor their comments at all. I can't think of any major social media site that gives a shit. The YouTube algorithm cares, but that's just for the videos themselves.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's very common on most social media for comments with swears to get shadow removed. Personally I often resort to non-ASCII lookalike characters instead, because fսсk those sһіttу censorship rules. But it's also a lot easier to just self-censor.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I often resort to non-ASCII lookalike characters instead

Interesting, got a link?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

I regularly use this page.

Unfortunately it looks like the font lemmy-ui uses really fucked up the 'h' lookalike:

on my phone when I wrote that comment last night I thought I could just about see the difference between the lookalike 'u' and a real 'u' because it wasn't the same height as the (real) 'c' next to it. But I may have been imagining that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lefty7283@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Yea I fuck**g hate it

[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 21 points 1 week ago
[–] doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I f**king love how censoring curse words has become the new c*rsing for the internet!

Used to be that cursing was a way to show your disdain for having restrictions placed on your freedom of expression. Now cursing without censorship is considered "polite internet speech" and adding an * is offensive and uncouth. Your right to express yourself how you choose be d*mned!

The irony is too good!

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought it was to get around algorithms suppressing things that aren't considered "family friendly."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TokenEffort@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think censoring t** wrong fucking words is funnier

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

A fun consequence is the effect that any removed or censored words are effectively vulgar and sexual.

You f*** in the ****You fill in the gaps

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 14 points 1 week ago

If you do this, I will never not make fun of you.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point why not just have an uncensoring bot that corrects this kind of stuff

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I genuinely would like that. I do not want to use a web controlled by pro-advertiser policies or pearl-clutching daftness.

[–] bruhbeans@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Put the swears back, kthxbi

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Weird trend across all platforms the last few years. In the days of broadcast media the FCC could regulate content. Then advertisers privatized the role. Then the Internet revived the free for all of public access. Then somebody worked some kind of Queen Victoria magic on content creators to get them to both write and visually bleep parts of words on behalf of the advertisers and publishers.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

H@nd h0lding.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

True, the selfcensorship on lemmy is fucking disg*sting at this point!

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Should have censored "censored".

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I think it's funny that some Lemmy users get upset about censoring. In real life I try not to swear much, so that when I do it's more impactful. Also censoring the word still gets the meaning across.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago

I'm very much of the opinion of "shit or get off the pot". If you don't want to swear, cool, don't. Censoring it reminds me of all the exhausting nonsense and theatre related to "think of the children" (and more recently, "think of the advertisers"). None of that stuff does a lick of good for anyone, except perhaps the swindlers pushing it.

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago

That rememembers me when I was bullied in reddit for censor the name of brands when I was talking about piracy.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why in front of the kid? With the r*ling? All ya gotta do is say "earmuffs" to him.. "earmuffs". Then you can say "Fuck, shit, rule" whatever you want!

load more comments
view more: next ›