this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
115 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39376 readers
2204 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Biden administration is considering new sanctions on Russia’s oil exports and shadow tanker fleet to further weaken its economy and war efforts before Trump takes office.

These measures aim to bolster Ukraine’s leverage in potential negotiations as Trump has signaled interest in a quick resolution to the war.

While targeting Russian crude buyers—similar to sanctions on Iranian oil—could pressure Russia, it risks spiking global oil prices and straining ties with major importers like China and India.

Biden’s shift reflects urgency to constrain Putin before U.S. policy potentially shifts under Trump.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

russia is committing an active genocide. all these sanctions shoulda already been in place. i'm deeply frustrated how biden's admin will go down as the "too little too late" admin. and i think the dude is just like… addicted to compromise. dude has big neville chamberlain energy

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

US sanctions on Russia have been in effect since 2014, and have only been increased since Biden took office.

The article states that these sanctions could result in increased costs to Americans, which is why he was reluctant to enforce them before now. At this point, it’s intended to be a final squeeze on Putin’s resources before Trump comes in and offers him a third of Ukraine.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago

...which is why he was reluctant to enforce them before now.

That's certainly part of it but the 2nd half of the article touches on the ramifications to other parts of US and Western foreign policy and relations. If the US goes full on, such as direct sanctions on buyers of Russian O&G there would be deep impacts to China and India, two countries where we are already trying to thread a foreign policy needle.

It is, unfortunately, a balancing act.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If usa sanctioned countries for genocide, there wouldn't be a usa.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

sure yeah. i'm still allowed to frustrated about it

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Peace for our times! (4 years)

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They're really going hard and definitely gonna shut down putin during the next two weeks. \s

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 0 points 2 weeks ago

They could've done it three years sooner tbf