this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
209 points (99.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6771 readers
858 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The opposite of a suicide vest.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Homicide vest

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

A fuck you and all them mother fuckers too vest

[–] innermeerkat@jlai.lu 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, it’s actually a suicide vest. The recoil of all these mini canons would crush your ribcage.

And as you need to aim with own body before dying and possibly miss your shots, it’s actually a pretty bad suicide vest.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Clearly what you need to do to avoid the recoil is mount the guns on a solid metal hoop like structure around your chest, and have a matching set in the back to balance the forces. One pull of the trigger and you ruin everybody's day.

[–] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago

Adolf Tittler

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

There's actually 20.

*unzips.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 21 points 1 week ago

The only way to stop a bad guy with 19 guns is a good guy with 19 guns

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

leans rocking chair all the way back

Preparing to engage maximum range!

[–] radical_larry@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Jesse duck!

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Would you still love me if I was a grenade?

[–] essell@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

a classic conundrum. Which would you rather fight?

One guy with 19 guns or 19 guys with one gun? 🤔

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are we talking movie logic where all 19 of them inexplicably take turns one at a time instead of just overwhelming me?

[–] essell@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Movie logic. Also known as gay-bar logic.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Well, they have to share the gun.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

THERE WAS A FIRE FIIIIGHT!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sleeping with those has to be uncomfortable.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

The man who sleeps with a battery of nipple guns is a fool every night but one.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Might want a reduction down to 9.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Herr Colonel Heinrich Gesundheit.

[–] Crewman@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Anyone else want a bagel?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think I could keep up all of them at the same time ... my tickie ticker would just give up, the bullets would just lazily drool to the ground.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

He misses at least one spot to mount another gun:

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Capone Bege?