this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
13 points (81.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55056 readers
164 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My idea is that, in general, trojans aren't trustworthy for obvious reasons. But this cracker came from cs.rin.ru apparently which I DO trust.

(yes this is a win defender thing BUT I don't know if its onto something lol)

CS rin main post

Github latest release

I read something about !ml is a good sign but I am still skeptical

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 48 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No, trojans are never trustworthy.

But if you think it might be a false positive, put it into virustotal and a sandbox to see what it does.

[–] Micromot@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The github repo looks fine tbh

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 29 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The source might look good, but are you (figurative you, I know you're not OP) compiling it yourself or using the recompiled binaries? It wouldn't be the first time github releases contained malware.

[–] MaggotInfested@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, but that doesn't mean people don't upload malware anyway.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Check virustotal