this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
586 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

5278 readers
451 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The petition is open to all EU resident. The goal is to replace all Windows in all public institution in Europe with a sovereign GNU/Linux.

If the petition is successful it would be a huge step forward for GNU/Linux adoption.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 9 points 15 hours ago

Adopting Linux is the best way to help ensure European sovereignty from maga meddling.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 25 points 19 hours ago

PSA: You can support this petition even if you're not an EU resident

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 13 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

I mean I'd be fine with BSD too. the point should be to force public institutions to use FOSS

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

FreeBSD is fine for servers I guess, but due that most server administrators know Linux better than any BSD, it's probably not going to be used much. BSD's also seem to be severely underfunded and the future of them seem vague.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Sure but nobody is petitioning for BSD desktops in the EU

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they can keep the MS lobbyists out, it's feasible, just ask Munich.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 19 hours ago

Except they couldn't keep the Micro$oft ~~criminals~~ lobbyists out

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago (17 children)

It’s ridiculous that governments don’t use customized Unix/Linux builds.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 19 hours ago

I expect 100% already do. Its ridiculous that they're not forced to, though

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] bustAsh@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

My main worry with Linux becoming more popular is that it will be attacked with more malware and viruses. I wouldn't mind though if Linux programmers could come up with better protection.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Most of the Windows malware gets deployed by some user downloading and executing random files they downloaded on the web. Since installing applications on Linux is usually done through some centralized package manager or app store (Flathub), it almost entirely eliminates this attack vector. Running random scripts from the internet by downloading them using curl and piping them into sudo bash is a whole nother issue though. Noob-friendly distros like Ubuntu should IMO have some safeguards in place to block these actions.

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

Since installing applications on Linux is usually done through some centralized package manager or app store (Flathub), it almost entirely eliminates this attack vector.

xz moment.

Yes, I see that weasel word "almost" in that sentence. I expect it's going to be doing increasingly heavy lifting as Linux becomes a more lucrative target to attack over time.

Your point generally stands, though. Even if they're fallible, at least someone is vetting it at all somewhere in this pipeline.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago

They have, snaps

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Linux is already what a decent chunk of servers run, so I don't really see it increasing malware.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Well, servers don't generally run Thunderbird and Firefox

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The insecure parts of Linux is mostly on the DE side opposed to the core OS part that servers use. We absolutely will see more vulnerabilities in the future as Linux grows.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Many developments over the last few years have been for improving those aspects, e.g. Wayland is far more secure than X11 could ever be. There will be more vulnerabilities found, but it won't be as bad as one might fear.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

Flatpak too, they could force more filesystem restrictions tho, line Android apps

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago

"I'd just like to interject for a moment..."

load more comments
view more: next ›