this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
1053 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

11243 readers
3900 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cybermass@lemmy.ca 114 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder what the survival rate is for these fishes

[–] jared@mander.xyz 179 points 1 week ago (3 children)

According to the links in this post It's 95%-99% survival.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Then why can't I yeet a bunch of goldfish

[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (7 children)

One of the bigger reasons has to do with the square cube law - as the size of something increases, surface area increases by a factor of 2 but mass increases by a factor of 3, so little fishes have a surface area-to-mass ratio that is quite a bit higher than a larger fish, and they're more susceptible to abrupt changes in temperature.

Kinda like how an ice cube will melt a lot faster than a big slab of ice, the core temperature of some small fish like a goldfish is gonna change more rapidly than the core temperature of a big fish like a trout so they tend to be a lot more finnicky in regard to significant and instantaneous changes to temperature and stuff. A larger fish might shrug off a significant change because it affects them more slowly, but that might be a totally wild an overwhelming experience for a little fish to go through

[–] BanjoShepard@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And in a similar but completely different way, the fish are being added to massive bodies of water. Home aquariums are minute in comparison, so they can't balance out chemical swings as easily and are much more prone to higher levels of nitrites and other toxic chemicals. The larger the body of water, the more stable the water quality.

[–] turtlepower@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So what I hear you saying is I need a bigger aquarium...

[–] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago

You always need a bigger aquarium

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could probably air drop one goldfish into a 100 gallon tank and it'd be fine (assuming it survived the fall).

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

something i love about Lemmy is that on the drop of a hat someone is willing to calculate the "surface area to fish ratio"

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Problem is, you almost never know if that's actually true or complete bullshit.

It seems plausible, but killing virgins for rain also seemed plausible back then in the 70s.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"But it has rained, hasn't it?" Smug look

An example of why arguing with idiots is impossible to win.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

The 70s was a wild time.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The math actually works, and is quite simple. Just assume the fish is a sphere

[–] superkret@feddit.org 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

As opposed to the high friction vacuums we are used to.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

IMMA YEET THEM SO FAR

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jared@mander.xyz 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] explodIng_lIme@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Skill issue

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Who's stopping you?

MAKE your DREAMS come TRUE

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You can yeet goldfish. Carp are stupid tough. It's the tropical fish we often keep that are kinda wimpy. Also, they're not coming from a super healthy environment (the store) to our tanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Have a pilots license?

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe 95% survive, but how many are injured in a way that might impact their quality of life?

Since these are being dropped specifically for the purpose of being caught and killed asap, quality of life might not matter.

For your sad little goldfish, please be gentle!

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Also, gotta think about whether 5% mortality rate is acceptable.

For an airdrop number of pond fish? Sure!

For your hobbyist number of expensive fish? Absolutely not

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zik@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wonder what the "fuck that hurt" rate is for these fishes

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 16 points 1 week ago

...that sounds to me like "survive the fall" more than "survive the week"

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People ITT must've forgotten about the salmon cannon.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 18 points 1 week ago

I have never seen this and thank you for sharing it because good god I needed it.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 44 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm gonna keep that typo. 😈

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure I can let you get awat with that.

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly it fits. It reads like "bombs awWAT"

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Carpet bombing

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

Good thing I love a little sabotage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

From another similar post, introducing fish to a large body of water has to be done like this or else the fish don't understand or acclimate properly and die. It's a slap to the noggin like "hey wakey wakey, go find some algae to nibble on"

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 25 points 1 week ago
[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do they stop the little parachutes from sliding off?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just make sure the strap between the legs is tight enough.

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 16 points 1 week ago

Gotta weed out the weak ones with the fall.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

The famous flying fish.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

So, if I understand you correctly, what you're saying is - given the quite large body of water about half a mile away from me, all downhill, I should get a giant catapult and fling some piranha.

I'll go down in history, either for the best April Fools joke ever, or if my aim is off, the best Halloween prank ever 🐟🐠🐟😁

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fishmonger bros be down there with a net

load more comments (1 replies)

I mean, that’s just Utah… Good chance it’s not up to speed

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Bombs Awash

[–] atyaz@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

I'm guessing only a few need to survive

load more comments
view more: next ›