this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

Reptiles and Amphibians

871 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Currently in an argument- "too thin to be a Gila" vs "too beaded to be a chuckwalla"

Very sluggish, but it's only like 19c today. Maybe 25-30cm long

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sal@mander.xyz 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Very cool!! My opinion is that it is a thin gila monster

I found another image of a Gila monster with a similar color pattern - with the small black dots inside hexagonal orange patches: https://btarboretum.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/20230410_102910-1536x1536.jpg

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 6 points 4 days ago

Gila monster. That head shape and legs/digits proportions could never be a Chuckwalla's. Skin looks like a Gilas too.

Sometimes lizards get sick and look thinner than normal and sluggish, I've found some like that.

[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

My biologist partner says it is a gila monster.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

I don't think it's a gila

[–] Are_Euclidding_Me@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

That is very much not a gila monster. I don't know what a chuckwalla is, so I can't comment on that, but both my partner and I (we both lived in Tucson for years) were immediately like "nah, that's not a gila monster". I don't think it's a gila monster.

[–] hash@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago

I don't have the credentials some of these guys do but I'd say that sure as fuck isn't a chuckwalla. Seems like it's the real deal...