this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
68 points (97.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5394 readers
112 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JGcEowt4YXuUtkBUGHoN@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One thing that I’m hopefully about is that solar is so cheap now so that will continue to roll out like crazy unless someone places huge tariffs on imported goods… oh shit. I just found out about the massive tariffs that fascist is wanting to put in place.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

That the US is going to fall further behind China in green energy technology.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

🔥🌎🔥

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

As someone currently on extended vacation, enjoying several national parks, I would suspect national parks will be gutted for natural resources.

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Assuming there is more oil to drill for...

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

There’s plenty under the 28M acre Alaskan wildlife refuge that Biden secured this term. I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump granted drilling rights in his first year.

https://www.ogj.com/general-interest/government/article/55241389/biden-moves-to-limit-oil-drilling-in-anwr-hours-after-trumps-election

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

There's more oil. Peak oil is about easy to get oil, not actually running out. We'll spend whatever it takes to keep this machine turning.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The oil will be drilled now or later anyway.

The question is how much is burned when and why. I can't really see anyone anywhere being interested in consuming more oil. If consumption stays the same, he'll basically just be dumping the price.

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Reducing oil prices reduces the financial incentives for using bicycles, taking public transit, living in a city and using renewable energy sources. Drilling itself also has environmental impacts.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

How about to each his or her or their own? Like let Texas be the oil smeared radioactive smelling shithole it wants to be?

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 1 points 1 month ago

What does that mean for climate concerns?

Kill babies, kill.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

He can't make the unextractable extractable. Nor can he make consumption stop. In terms of the Keeling curve, the impact is exactly zero.