this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
18 points (82.1% liked)

Privacy

32627 readers
407 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The terrible irony of a for-profit company using the Anarchist A. I hate it.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] Killercat103@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whats with the Anarchist A? Is it anything more than reduce its meaning into an aesthetic?

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks like it's a for profit company so take a guess...

[–] Killercat103@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago

Can't remember

[–] M600@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s pretty new, I’d give it a few years before trusting it.

If I’m self hosting it, then I’ll just setup wireguard.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's their MO?

New entrant into already saturated market?

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

They forgot.

[–] krnl386@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

Well, they forked wireguard go… I say their seriousness will depend on:

  • how well they maintain their fork
  • whether or not they continue to offer their self-hosted tier

I’ve been burned too many times by startups who gathered up some initial money from investors and then went all corpo once the money dried up.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The service seems kind of generic, maybe even worse than the other generic VPN services. No statements about what they log, whether they allow p2p, no mention of port forwarding, servers in only 5 countries which you may/may not want to VPN through, etc.

Not sure about the software, I guess they think it will be an improvement over OpenVPN/WireGuard which is debatable.

[–] shaserlark@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Looks like my telegram dealer has opened up a VPN provider startup, very weird aesthetics. Can’t say anything about the product though, I guess it’s good to have more competition in the market?

[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm just being dumb and can't find it but...its a massive red flag for a VPN not to have a privacy policy.

[–] scorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks like they

  • collect "depersonalized" data
  • they use hidden pixels for tracking
  • allow advertisers to gather info such as your IP address
[–] Trincapinones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

That's a major red flag for a VPN

[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So they share "depersonalized" data with advertisers.

They user hidden pixels to track you on their website.

And they allow advertisers to collect your IP address to send you personalized ads.

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

looks good on paper. idk what's behind it