416
Maker of ‘smart’ chastity cage left users’ emails, passwords, and locations exposed
(techcrunch.com)
Some things just shouldn't be connected to the internet.
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
416 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
59593 readers
2888 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
~~Some~~ MOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
FTFY
~~Some~~ ~~MOST~~ things just should~~n’t~~ be connected to the internet.
IFTTT
~~Some~~ ~~MOST~~ things just shouldn’t be ~~connected~~ ~~to~~ ~~the~~ ~~internet.~~
Checks out. All suffering is caused by being.
~~Some~~ ~~MOST~~ things ~~just~~ ~~shouldn’t~~ ~~be~~ ~~connected~~ ~~to~~ ~~the~~ ~~internet.~~
Apparently I'm one of those things. Jesus, what an article
Unfortunately connecting this kink to the internet facilitates doing it. Having the device itself connect for ease of use had caused an unbelievable amount of tech issues, though. To be fair the programmer is a dipshit, though.
But that just makes connecting those things to the internet forbidden... and therefore alluring.
and therefore alluring.
...provides the most complete remote sex solution for the Internet and corporate intranet.
Lol ha ha
A piece of internet history. So glad it's been preserved.
That thumbnail is A+
So is the headline. Chastity cage, exposed. 🤣
Example #4363 why making everything "smart" is a terrible fucking idea
Not inherently, they coulda followed best practices. But this is definitely a reason not to buy smart things.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao
We live in the weirdest timeline
load more comments
(1 replies)
Isn't this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it's more of a service.
That would be non-consensual.
Probably in the EULA
I'll be honest, not the worst possible issue with a smart chastity cage that I could think of.
It is when I lock your shit remotely and then change the password
TFW chinese hackers hold your dick for ransom until you send them crypto
At least someone other than me is holding my dick.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,
10,000 users‽
yup :3
Rule 34 extends to action as well as observance.
Your cock is mine now
I'm dying
That probably worked for most of the clientele.
This exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.
And to think I don't even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV...
load more comments
(1 replies)
The chastity belt may be smart, but the maker never claimed to be so.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users, thanks to two vulnerabilities.
He also reached out to the company on June 17 alerting them of the issues in an attempt to get them to fix the vulnerabilities and protect their users’ data, according to a screenshot of the email he sent and shared with TechCrunch.
[REDACTED] has left the site wide open, allowing any script kiddie to grab any and all customer information.
“Your cock is mine now,” the hacker told one of the victims, according to a researcher who discovered the hacking campaign at the time.
In 2016, researchers found a bug in a Bluetooth-powered “panty buster,” which allowed anyone to control the sex toy remotely over the internet.
In 2017, a smart sex toy maker agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by two women who alleged the company spied on them by collecting and recording “highly intimate and sensitive data” of its users.
The original article contains 702 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
No, no, no, no. No. Surely the hacker knows the victim probably did not see that comment as a threat 😭
Sign up for the cage, get a bonus dom!
I feel like like the potential for being exposed as a chastity cage user might actually be a plus for some users
God i hope the users used a email alias and fake names
view more: next ›