120
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by FinnFooted@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RockyBass@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With the current news surfacing (so to speak) about neglect and dismissal of safety concerns by the owner, that lawsuit is potentially going to be massive.

[-] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is, admittedly, news to me. As someone who served on a submarine in the Navy I know first hand how serious neglect is. It can, and has in this case, kill everyone. It's not slow either. If you are negligent about anything for even a second everyone is dead. It's just a shame the person/people responsible also took innocent life. Preventable and inexcusable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

You know, if I were ever to go down to the depth of the ocean with my friends and family on board to see the Titanic, I would make sure that the vehicle I'm riding in is overbuilt for safety and that everything that could go wrong is considered beforehand.

Why take any risk at all? With the amount of money that they had they could have hired an entire crew of an actual submarine for a day or two.

[-] Laxaria@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Most submarines/submersibles can't actually get that deep, and of the few that can, some are government run and others are already on other projects.

What made OceanGate's Titan unique is that they were selling expeditions to the Titanic.

Now with all that said, if I had the disposable income to take on such an expedition, $250k sounds way too cheap/good to be true. Unfortunately in this case it was indeed too good to be true.

[-] slinky317@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

OceanGate was skirting safety protocols with the Titan.

[-] Laxaria@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes I think that's a very agreeable statement.

[-] nrezcm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well lets agree to agree then.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] green_dragon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They understood the risks; there is no question in my mind that they didn't. I think they were bored with what life could offer them with that much money. At a certain point you really can basically experience it all. Instead of going on a tested rocket ship; they gambled the ultimate wager. Their life or bragging rights. Image the tale you could tell coming back from the journey in such a rigged tube; or the publicity of your fatal demise and making a "historical" moment regarding it. The world was watching. Darkly their death reads better than any final service of passing or headstone does.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There’s something inherently dangerous about rare, exclusive experiences. When millions of people do something, like fly commercial, you know it’s going to be pretty safe. When you find yourself going for an experience that only 6 people have ever had, ever, your danger warnings should be going off.

[-] green_dragon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Indeed their warning signals were going off; they just chose to ignore them. The true reasons we will never know. Perhaps proof of concept; to defy the authority of regulatory bodies, the thrill of knowing the danger, understanding the world would be watching, or something other going on in their life. They had to means to do basically anything they wanted with their money. They chose to go into a tube and descend to the abyss.

[-] pdanese14@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why take any risk at all? With the amount of money that they had they could have hired an entire crew of an actual submarine for a day or two.

I can't tell you what their motivations were, but I think there were 2 types of people doing this.

  • Type 1: the "captain" and many/most of the passengers were adrenaline junkies who wanted to push the limits of what could be done. Kind of like the first people to travel to the north and south poles. They are "adventurers" and they understood that they were taking considerable risks with their lives.

  • Type 2: people who were trying to purchase a great "cocktail party story" with their $$$. The same way that wealthy people today pay $$ to have sherpas lug their stuff up and down Mt Everest so they can take a selfie. The ability to drop a quarter-of-a-million $$ on this stunt already excludes most of the world's population from even trying it. Then they can brag at their cocktail parties and make the Mt. Everest climbers look like wimps by comparison. I suspect (not sure) that the Pakistani business man falls into this category. The fact that he took his 19 year old son makes me think he completely discounted the risk and was just doing it for personal vanity.

I'm speculating on all of this and I don't mean to cast aspersions on the Pakistani guy and his son. For all I know, my analysis could be all wrong.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] veedems@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I just can’t understand why ANYONE with that much money wouldn’t be a little more careful about where they choose to take risk. A little investigation on their part would have turned up the previous safety concerns.

[-] Kabaka@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

The 19-year-old reportedly told family he was terrified. It was Father's Day and his father is very interested in the Titanic, so he went anyway. He was just trying to impress and relate to his father.

[-] thallamabond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

One thing you can't buy with money is intelligence.

[-] Mac@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Except that you can: you hire intelligence. He paid people to build it and fired them when they weren't comfortable with the design and had safety concerns. Lol

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know anything about this guy, so take my pet theories with a pinch of salt, but...

  1. In my experience, people who think of themselves as entrepreneurs are often simply bad at perceiving risk. They start out with a certain hubris that is a product of this deficiency in assessing risk. Many of them will be taken down by this, but others will get lucky.

  2. When they get lucky, these people tend not to notice the element of luck but ascribe their success wholly to their smarts and hard work. This can lead to an inflated sense of how good one's judgement is.

  3. It can also lead to a lack of humility. It takes both good judgement and humility to know when to defer to someone else's judgement. These people had hubris to start with, and their success can compound this to the point where they consider themselves the best judge of everything. Then they stop listening to people who may know better than them.

  4. They also have the power to surround themselves with yes-men, so they are challenged less and less as time goes on.

Maybe this guy wasn't like that, but his comments about safety measures being a waste, his disregard for safety standards in constructing this submarine, and the way he fired the employee who complained that the sub was unsafe, suggest he may have been in this mold.

[-] skillissuer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

In my experience, people who think of themselves as entrepreneurs are often simply bad at perceiving risk. They start out with a certain hubris that is a product of this deficiency in assessing risk. Many of them will be taken down by this, but others will get lucky.

specifically, you don't hear much about those unlucky

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Survivor bias at its finest.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I know a lot of people (not here necessarily) have been commenting on how these were rich people, but regardless of their financial situation they were just people first. I don't know anything about them and that being the case I'm going with this being a tragedy. I feel for the families that were left behind.

[-] camaradeboina@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

TBH what gets me angry is the fact literally less than a week before the single biggest sea faring tragedy that hit the Mediterranean sea, and easily one of the top 20 straight up sea tragedy in recent memory happened and literally nobody gave nor is giving a shit.

A boat full of migrants sunk between Greece and Italy, 80 have been confirmed dead, more than 500 are missing, and the worst is, the boat was being surveilled the entire time by Frontex and the Greek coast guard who straight up lied (or chose not to see) the distress the ship was in.

I can understand people lashing out at the death of rich people driven largely by their hubris and trusting a downright irresponsible psycho.

[-] HuskyRacoon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You're correct. I feel far worse for the refugees than the billionaires in the sub. But that being said i feel awful for the 19 year old on that ship. I know i would have said yes too because how many people can say "im going on holiday to the titanic" sounds great in concept. He may have been a rich kid but still a kid.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pmmeyourtoaster@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Am curious how long this has been there and whether perhaps the "banging" was not related whatsoever.

[-] philz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I believe they confirmed in the press conference the bangs were not related due to where the debris was found.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FinnFooted@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the debris sites indicate the implosion happened relatively soon after descent because the debris had drifted very far away from the Titanic. If they had descended deeper, the implosion would have been closer.

[-] AliLunaCat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I heard the banging sound happened at 30 minute intervals for a while, but also the banging sounds could've been from one of the many search boats that were searching near the acoustic bouy

[-] WassupDoc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I really hope that the sub imploded during the descent, and they've been dead all this time. Rather than the hull giving out after they sat on the ocean floor for days.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Rhabuko@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Better to die in an instant than the alternative.

[-] edgarallenpwn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I really didn't care too much about what was going on until last night when I realized the horror of sitting in a metal tube, knowing you probably won't be rescued with a ticking timer of when your resources would run out. It seems like the perfect horror movie but irl. I hope implosion was the cause because the alternative has cause my brain to go into a full panic / existential mode and I am just an observer.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TrickyCamel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

At least they didn't have to suffer for any stretch of time, I hope.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

According to submariners in other communities, the worst part would be any period of time where they knew they were sinking. That could be an hour of slowly falling from periscope depth or no time at all if the hull failed at a deep enough depth. The water forms a piston much like one in a truck engine that compresses the air enough to cause combustion. Any of the three things in that nano second will kill you before your body can process the information. The water hammer, the pressure shift, and the implosion all occur too quickly for the nerves to transmit the information.

[-] FinnFooted@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like they did not. An update:

A Navy official says "an acoustic anomaly consistent with an implosion" was detected shortly after the Titan lost contact with the surface. This official said the information was relayed to the Coast Guard team which used it to narrow the radius of the search area.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

So they knew about it, but let the news milk the topic for 4 days?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PresidentGrover@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for the Internet Historian video in a few years.

[-] AB7ORH7D@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think he would be more interested in covering the Reddit story - he is the internet historian after all.

[-] IndictEvolution@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So, I understand that because water is not compressible, animals without air in their bodies are safe at such high pressures in the deep sea, but what I'm wondering is what would it look like if a human in the deep sea was suddenly exposed to those pressures, as would happen if a submarine rapidly pressurizes? I know the lungs would collapse and whatnot because the air would be pressurized into I'm guessing a liquid, like how propane sloshes when under pressure in a tank, but what else? What causes the instant death? Maybe the water shoots into nose/mouth so fast it acts like a bullet and applies a bunch of force to the walls internally?

[-] talldangry@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

These are styrofoam cups that've been crushed by the pressure at the bottom of the ocean. The water isn't looking for your nose, it'd just crush your outsides into your insides until you hit a relative density, like the cup, but not as pretty. The air in your lungs would instantly compress and heat to several thousand degrees C, turning your insides back into your outsides. I think.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Windexhammer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If it was truly a rapid implosion as described by the Navy, then the whole thing will have crumpled like a steam implosion in which case, everyone inside is likely immediately dead from blunt force trauma.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wazoobonkerbrain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Before wreckage found: We hear banging every 30 minutes

After wreckage found: We heard a big pop on Sunday

[-] SupersonicScrub@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is actually quite normal, and similar situations have occurred during search and rescues for missing submarines. The ocean carries sound quite well, and hydrophones will inevitably pick up noises of from all sorts of of things if observed for long enough. Add into that the extra noises of the all the search and rescue assets in the vicinity and the natural biases of the human operators to want to decipher patterns from the background noise; false positives are quite typical.

A similar situation happened with the sinking of the USS Thresher. https://www.forces.net/usa/banging-sounds-heard-during-search-sunken-us-submarine-uss-thresher

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Anyway, what did everybody have for lunch today?

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
120 points (95.5% liked)

World News

38563 readers
4377 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS