this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
43 points (95.7% liked)

science

15000 readers
361 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 months ago

The antidote, he added, is “being curious and being humble.”

TLDR there's almost no chance the people who are dangerously wrong are capable of fixing their opinions.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

we need classes in high school or maybe even earlier that teach general media/social media/political literacy, that teach kids about technology, rhetorical techniques, fallacies, etc that are used to prey on emotions and biases. what does a (political) Dog whistle sound like? what are some red flags you might encounter while watching a conspiracist on Tik Tok? what can you do to prevent yourself from being radicalized by youtube's algorithm? what can AI currently do, and how can you identify it?

the problem is all this stuff moves so much faster than education does, so it's going to be a constant uphill battle.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

You don't even need to do all of that. Simply teaching kids to be curious, critical, and not afraid of failure prepares them in a much more universal/general sense.

A lot of these people were probably told they were special growing up and "really smart," which unintentionally reinforces the idea that they naturally know things and their identity is tied to being smart/knowledgeable. So when anyone contradicts that identity--confronting them with facts that don't align with what they thought to be true--it feels like an existential threat to their ego.