this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
870 points (98.5% liked)

memes

10701 readers
2803 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Seraph@fedia.io 68 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Science is indistinguishable from magic, if you don't care to learn how science works.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

But... if there's a consistent system along which magic works which can be studied/researched/formulated, then isn't it just... science?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

nobody is convincing me assembly programming isnt magic

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Study a 6502. It's just electrons doing the only thing they can.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

whats the best way to start?

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I don't know about the best (because I started back in the 80s with a commodore 64, not exactly repeatable) but a good way is this guy: https://eater.net/6502

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Assembly isn't magic. Computers compiling/interpreting high-level languages into assembly, and making everything works without constantly breaking IS MAGIC

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 2 months ago

The keyword is consistent. Some settings have magic as inherently chaotic and difficult to control.

A good rule of thumb is that if a fantasy setting has a school for magic, it's probably a science. If it's knowledge passed from master to magically gifted student, it's probably not very consistent.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's not how magic works

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

magic works

Humans have yet to prove it.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Well, it sometimes does

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I absolutely feel like in a thousand years, we'll talk to a machine and not even know how it works.

Hell, I look at the computer in front of me and only feel like I know a fraction of what's going on.

[–] CheesyGordita@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Hail the Omnissiah!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago

Magnets, how do they work?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just love how the conspiracies reinforce each-other in the most convenient ways.

"Anyone who doesn't get vaxed is going to be put in a FIMA concentration camp!"

"What? That's crazy, where's the evidence of that?!"

"You can't find it because they're censoring everything on the Internet."

So now, not finding evidence of conspiracy 1 is evidence for conspiracy 2!

[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"You can find the truth at www.truthfindarz.net, but I don't go there because it's full of conspiracies."

facepalm

[–] goatbeard@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I'm disappointed that's not a real link lol

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe a lot of conspiracy theories, but I do have some conspiracy hypotheses

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have conspiracy speculations

[–] kusari@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have conspiracy guestimations

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes when I'm alone I have conspiracy masturbations

[–] kusari@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

When you are at the Diddy party and you have a conspiracy ejaculation:

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also: when conspiracy theories are convenient ways to avoid havig to understand how things work.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And this a very common mindset, because most societies (some more than others) take children’s* innate curiosity and pound it flat for the sake of efficiency by way of standardisation. It really is a shame, since we waste a lot of potential as a species this way.

e: a word

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

That's what they want you to believe!

[–] lath@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

It's only a conspiracy theory if it's not a proven conspiracy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its only a conspiracy theory if its more than one guy.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not a native speaker but "guy" is gender neutral for a while now, at least on the variety used online. At least from what I know

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Litmus test is the "Would you have sex with a group of guys?"

If you're picturing a orgy with hairy people holding shlongs, then it's not gender neutral.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

"Guy" is used differently in different contexts, just like "girl".

If someone says "the girls had a sleepover" you know they're probably talking about female children. If someone's talking about a girls' night out, you know they're almost certainly talking about women.

"Would you have sex with a group of guys?” is using guy as a stand-in for man. But, if someone said "Guys, can we all just quiet down for a second so Stan can speak?" it's a synonym for "folks" or "people" or something gender-neutral.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Litmus test is the “Would you have sex with a group of guys?”

Dipping the tip into a group of guys and checking the color.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are correct but you can't get away from pedants online.

I know because I'm one of them.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well then you're not my friend, guy.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 months ago

He's not your guy buddy!

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Throwing a line from Hitman in the mix to make it more confusing:

“If it looks like a conspiracy, it probably isn’t.”

[–] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Why does it look like that then? Tananananana 🎵

[–] Panurge987@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just glad to see "whoa" spelled correctly.

[–] bizarrocullen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Wrong use of meme

[–] SuperApples@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Good use of Keanu meme, as he recently fell for and is promoting a conspiracy theory (ancient civilizations).

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Conversely, everything is a conspiracy when you do understand how things work.

[–] yboutros@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago

Underrated comment

Everyone's conspiring folks. What's hard to measure, is who's conspiring

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

It’s important to understand the prevalence of coincidence and incompetence. Humans are exceptional at pattern-finding – too good, really. In order to think critically, we need to recognise our own tendency to find patterns where none exist.

load more comments
view more: next ›