Technology

35123 readers

201 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

The Mozilla Graveyard (www.spacebar.news)

submitted 2 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

These are more because they basically fizzled out or the company they were working with decided to stop working with them rather than just shutting down services that people use unlike Google. Once again seems like a Firefox hit piece similar to others that have been cropping up everywhere

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I remember seeing some of this stuff when it came out and thinking "why are they doing this?" A bunch of it I never heard of, and a handful I wish had seen success (Firefox OS). Not sure how this counts as a hit piece, it didn't seem mean spirited and definitely didn't seem to be misrepresenting anything.

[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

I'm not saying it's a direct hit piece but it feels like people are being incentivized to write articles that paint Firefox in a negative light. Also I think a lot of these were attempts at making money outside of Google

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

FxOS only targeting low–mid-range phones in developing markets only seemed a bit odd. Basically no one had heard of it & these places largely choose used/old version of premium products to buying budget unless they have to. There was hype in the dev community about getting a B2G device, but there was hardly availability & specs were abysmal for an OS running a non-fast interpreted language like JavaScript. Not only that but the marketing was around openness & developer-friendliness—things average consumers don’t care about (even if they should).

Imagine in a parallel universe where the idea was managed properly & B2G left the phone sphere too—where school kids were required to get a FxBook instead of Chromebooks… 😶

[–] corbin@infosec.pub -3 points 2 months ago

Most of the services Google kills are also because they “fizzled out”. If you scroll through the Killed by Google site, a lot of the stuff listed there were test apps or small-scale experiments that most people never heard about or cared to try, like all the apps under Area 120. There are a few high-profile examples (Reader, Stadia, etc) but they’re definitely not the majority, same as Mozilla.

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They also had a "fire" stick, didn't they? Not to be confused with Amazon's fire stick

Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matchstick_TV

matchstick

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I got one of those Firefox OS phones for work once, very cool idea but the performance just wasn’t good enough to be comfortable.

[+] atro_city@fedia.io -6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't donate money to Mozilla they don't deserve it, much less need it after getting 500M from Google every year.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's "funny", because without that injection from Google, Mozilla would surely die. And the only reason Google hasn't stopped doing that is because then Chrome (Blink) would be more likely to be treated as a monopoly.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

That makes sense. And the leaders of Mozilla probably know this, so they have no incentive to be better, just to exist and pocket the money. Firefox won't get better unless another competitor appears and becomes a danger to it: danger meaning Google might give the competitor money instead of Mozilla.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Which is funny, because they've already been ruled a monopoly and that gravy train is going to be gone.

At the heart of the case are billions of dollars’ worth of exclusive agreements Google has inked over the years to become the default search engine on browsers and devices across the world.

According to the court, Google’s 2021 payment to Mozilla for the default position on its browser was more than $400 million, about 80 percent of Mozilla’s operating budget. A spokesperson for Mozilla said it was “closely reviewing” the decision and “how we can positively influence the next steps.”

Source