701
submitted 19 hours ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago

For everyone's edification, Geigner's take on Techdirt. I suspect this won't be the last TD article on this trainwreck-in-the-making.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 4 hours ago

Kick his ass Pocketpair

[-] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

Seeing a lot of comments on here and it just reminds me of what I have been telling my friends since day one.

  1. PalWorld is a threat to Pokemon. It has potential to crown Pokemon in a different way and really compete. Nintendo will 100% find a way. I told them and told them. I said the same thing on Reddit. Sure enough, downvoted.

  2. I love Pokemon, I love Zelda, and Mario but I absolutely love competition. There is no way a billion dollar franchise, multi level marketing, insanept popular game series is going to let something come along and compete against it. If you haven't watched The Boys on Amazon you are missing out. One of the most redeeming characters, IMO, says it best in two sentences in the boys in one whole episode and it is the premise of everything. "You don't get it do you? You don't mess with the money.

  3. I love seeing games come along and bring something new to the table because it should drive Nintendo to do better for GameFreak to do better. I liked PalWorld and welcomed it as someone who loves Pokemon. While PalWorld didn't maintain my interest its because Pokemon just does something for me PalWorld doesn't. However, that being said I have found my self turned away from Pokemon since Gen 7 and 8 semi redeemed 7 and 9 is just sad (performance wise). I have found my self playing the hell out of tjr classic Pokémon games. Point being I welcomed PalWorld in hopes that it would light a fire under Nintendo's ass to develop a really good next gen Pokemon game. It was wishful thinking though. Nintendo is a "don't mess with the money" company and that is all it is. Fuck Nintendo. PalWorld was good for the game industry. What Nintendo is going to try to set precedence on is that you can own an idea a simple concept.

I have been telling my friends for literal fucking years and for some reason they just swing the bat for Nintendo. Nintendo makes some great games but holy fuck they are a shit company. They just are. I told them over and over this was coming Nintendo would find something and now here we are.

I sent this too them and they all got silent. They genuinely believed Nintendo couldn't and wouldn't.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Well arguably they can't legally but... Bludgeoning people with lawyers regardless of legality is pretty standard big business behaviour

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 38 points 8 hours ago

"Multiple patents"

Specifies none

Off to a great start, I see. I know that actual game mechanics cannot be patented or copyrighted (the same principle applies to non digital games), so I'm really curious to what these patents are.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 5 hours ago

I know that actual game mechanics cannot be patented or copyrighted

In America, sure. But these are two Japanese companies...

I'm not an expert on Japanese copyright and patent law, but I don't have a great outlook for Palworld.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Someone linked a list of all the patents Pokemon Company specifically holds and the very first one was "creature breeding based on good sleep habits."

  1. How does that even get a patent?
  2. What the fuck iteration of Pokemon requires you to have good sleep habits to breed your pokemon? 🤨
  3. Does it actually help you sleep? 🤔 I might need to start breeding pokemon...
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Breed me, daddy.

[-] rislim@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Pokemon Sleep, sleep tracking app

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 7 hours ago

I know for sure that palworld does not promote good sleeping habits in any shape or form, at least not to my addicted ass

[-] sandbox@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You’ve mixed copyright and patents together and confused yourself a bit. Game mechanics cannot be copyrighted, but they can be patented. Some game component designs can be copyrighted as well, and even trademarked.

There are many, many, many game mechanics and features which have been patented, such as in-game chat, minigames on loading screens, arrow pointing to destination, and so on. Game studios have to license those features from the patent holders if they wish to use them.

Some random company even owns a patent for the concept of sending and receiving email on a mobile device. The entire system is a fucking joke.

[-] Charzard4261@programming.dev 9 points 8 hours ago

Game mechanics can be patented. It's stupid, but things such as "loading screen mini games" and "overhead arrows pointing to your objective" have been patented. The second I believe even got enforced once.

I think these kind of things have been getting approved less and less, but I wouldn't be surprised if "balls that contain monsters" was patented back in the early days too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

"Method for releasing 927 iterations of the same stale game across multiple platform generations."

It can't possibly be for "Method of splitting one complete game into two mutually exclusive cartridges with separate rosters to entice whales to buy two copies," because if it were they'd have already sued Capcom 15 years ago.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 105 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Patents and video games huh? We can't ignore what John Carmack had to say about this:

The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying.

--John Carmack

load more comments (36 replies)
[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Patenting things like this that are obviously unpatentable ideas rather than actual inventions is unfortunately a necessity for defensive purposes in a world where companies will do anything in order to kill competition except risk competing with them since that isn't guaranteed by throwing money at it. Enforcing a bunch of patents against a company with fewer liquid assets is a guaranteed way to beat a competitor with money alone since winning the suit isn't the goal, only draining the assets of the competitor. Sucks that this is considered a valid business practice now.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Oh shit here we go again with your rectangle looks too much like my rectangle.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
701 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

58135 readers
4520 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS