22
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

it seems goofy to me that they didn't take into account indoor light, as if your synapses differentiate between photons hitting your retinas and skin outside vs inside

also is there even such a thing as a place that has light pollution but not enough air pollution for that to be a bigger factor?

can someone make this whole thing not seem dumb to me?

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 17 hours ago

This was my thought. Most light pollution is in cities where you also have all sorts of other pollution. Reminds me just yesterday of an ingnoble study that said placebos with side effects work better than not but they were testing for pain tolerance and they produced the "side effect" with capsacin which is known to reduce pain.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2195 readers
172 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS