I'm all for shitting on AI but the anti-lgbt language in this post was not needed in any capacity. Most if not all of the examples given could also apply to a straight person.
What's the language I used? I'd be happy to edit my post.
I was specifically referring to the inclusion of lgbt being referred to as rainbow washing. I may have misunderstood the intention of your post, but my first read through and skimming of the article itself implied that it was a bad thing that they were trying to be inclusive. Like I said, all for getting rid of data collection and AI, but if its going to be around I would prefer it be representative of the entire spectrum of humanity and not just the conversvative straight monogomous/monotheistic majority
You're right, I may have over generalized. To me, this looked like pandering...
As with over things I dislike, seeing queer representationin it is better than queer exclusion from it. Rainbow capitalism, in general, is better queer-excluding capitalism, for example... but I just found this particular workshop to be rather tasteless, especially when nothing came out of it.
(When I say nothing, I mean for at least 3 years there was no output... The people behind this workshop created a road map, then released a collection of NFTs, and then the supposed AI model that would be created from it never materialized AFAICT.)
That's fair, I'm glad to hear it was just a misunderstanding then, and yeah NFTs... LOL. I appreciate you taking the time to respond and being cool :)
Combine the sexting AI with VR porn and you lost humanity forever.
To be uncomfortably honest, VR only covers sight and the AI is like the part of porn that everybody skips. Since you're not making a real connection with someone it feels meaningless. AI tries to give you exactly what you want, but that's not an authentic feeling relationship with give and take. Also I feel like there's still a tactile aspect that will be missing for a couple decades at minimum, and that should keep at least my monkey brain from becoming lost in the illusion...
Do you remember the first time you were aroused by language?
I do! Hadn't thought about it in at least twenty years. Thanks for the reminder, creepy chatbot that inspired this post. Thinking that an LLM could develop "its own sense of desire" was naive and seems ridiculous today, but I suppose their intentions were honorable as well as erotic.
This is where your donations to Firefox go.
Such a chatbot exists already. There are numerous sexting games on the app store capitalizing this. You can make the chatbot in AI town into sexting as well.
Mozilla is always late to the party.
Firefox
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox