this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43851 readers
743 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've read some things online about it all but I'm not a total IT boff. Is it really true that Brave browser won't be able to block ads once the changes are made next year?

Ps. I use Firefox with uBlock but my SO and most of my clients absolutely love Brave

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] carnha@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Brave tweeted this last year:

Manifest V3 will not prevent Brave from blocking ads. We built ad blocking into the browser itself so it will not be affected by Google changing its rules for extensions.

[โ€“] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Brave is absolut garbage anyway. Force them to use Firefox over security concerns.

[โ€“] godless@latte.isnot.coffee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fennec is even better than Firefox, it's the same source but recompiled to allow all add-ons in the main app. So basically a stable Firefox nightly, if you wish.

It's maintained by the folks behind the f-droid app store themselves, so arguably a highly trusted source.

Sync to Firefox desktop fully implemented and working.

[โ€“] burgersc12@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using Mull, a fork of Fennec

[โ€“] godless@latte.isnot.coffee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh nice, I'll check that out as well. What would you call the core differences?

[โ€“] burgersc12@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Supposedly its got more security/privacy/anti-tracking. From what i can tell there is no major differences besides it using this configuration user.js by default

Ah nice, sounds great. I'll test it over the weekend when I got some free time.

[โ€“] Seytoux@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True concern from a person that just got rid of chrome (finally) and switched to brave, how is it garbage? o_o

[โ€“] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

One thing that rings alarm bells for me is that they have a built-in adblocker, but you can enable Brave's ads instead and get a cryptocurrency reward. Brave takes 30% cut on the ads they show this way, so they are essentially replacing the website's monetization with their own monetization. Kind of scummy, and it being a cryptocurrency also looks grifty.

https://brave.com/brave-rewards/ (See "what % of ad revenue"...)

Secondly, the founder has really awful politics, but I will leave that to the reader.

[โ€“] darkstar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you provide reasons for your claim? I'm curious to know what makes Brave garbage

Chromium, The company behind it... How it looks... Shadiness.

[โ€“] aragon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It is best to move to Firefox because fundamentally the chromium project thrives because of Google ,an Ad company. It is not worth using chromium derivatives.

[โ€“] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Out of interest, since Chromium is open source, is there anything stopping Opera, Edge, Brave, etc. just mantaining support for the old manifest? Like, I'm not sure why this is such a big deal for anything other than Chrome and Chromium.

[โ€“] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Because nearly 90% of users use Chrome or a derivative thereof. People can make a V3 version for Chrome and a V2 version for other browsers, but the APIs are nowhere near compatible, so it's a lot of extra work. If you just make a V3 version, it will work on any updated browser.

[โ€“] Vlyn@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

When you do that you'd have to port every single security patch and new feature manually into your fork. And it gets even worse: Because you deviate from the original implementation you continue to use outdated code that nobody is patching at all.

So you can absolutely do that, but in a year you'll have your own browser with tons of security issues and no manpower to find and fix them.

Basically you'd be using an old browser version.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ