this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
130 points (89.6% liked)

You Should Know

33392 readers
5 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Already getting sick of seeing 'AI' results at the top of a search when all you want is a link to a site?

I just discovered this article showing a way to not see it (although it doesn't disable it altogether).

TLDR:

  • In Chrome open settings menu, choose Search engine on left menu and scroll down to site search
  • Click Add button and choose a name (eg Old Google, Google Web or whatever)
  • Add a shortcut word (eg web, og, or whatever)
  • Add this URL string: https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&udm=14
  • Save that, and now if you search for something and use the shortcut word you set you'll just get proper results, no 'AI' shown
  • Or, if you don't want to have to add a shortcut word, you just make that search your default (use the 3 dot menu next to the name you set) and all searches will show that way, no shortcut word needed.

EDIT - meant to add that there are detailed instructions for Edge, Firefox and Safari in the article if you don't use Chrome

Hope that helps someone - I really don't like all that extra nonsense when I just want a link to a site that I know exists!

[Obligatory - "or don't use Chrome/Google...", I know - but people do, so this might be useful]

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 70 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

As you said there are people who don't want to switch from Chrome and Google, but at this point if you're talking about a ten step fix-it plan, is really does make more sense to just use Firefox and DDG. Or searx, I'm pretty sure that's still fewer steps.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Yeah. I went to duck duck go a while ago.

Their default maps is terrible, but web search works fine.

For some reason the only videos they link on the video tab is YouTube tho, which sucks and you're better off just searching YouTube instead at that point.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

DDG

"Hey wanna use our AI chat?!"
"Hey, like these autogenerated result-blobs instead of your actual results?"
"Hey, we thought you hate finding the place you were looking for, so we use Apple Maps to ensure you're getting fucking nowhere, ever!"

I wish DDG was usable. All it is, is a good showcase that Google isn't as bad as they could be.

[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pfttt… at least with DDG you can turn any of that stuff off with a button in a UI rather than having to make a new bookmark or fuck around with your browsers search engine.

You can even turn the ads off if you want.

Also, Apple Maps is totally fine, it’s not overloaded with ads like Google Maps is and it basically always finds the place I search for.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Also, Apple Maps is totally fine, it’s not overloaded with ads like Google Maps is and it basically always finds the place I search for.

Okay this is the one thing I'd readily disagree on.

Beyond its absolutely inability to find non-US results (there's a steak house next to me, I can enter that exact name including capitalization + the name of the city I live in, and it'll instead find a different-named steak house in a US city names like my non-US one instead), not being able to click places on the map to select them is just laughable.

Nevermind how it's navigation is ridiculous, at least over here. It just travels shortest path, no respect for traffic lights or anything.

It's a very good showcase of how superior Google Maps actually is, as a maps application. And how much openstreetmap has left everything else in the dust, too.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 2 points 3 months ago

Agreed, and additionally in Australka at least it's also slow as absolute fuck. Click on the map preview? Takes at least 30s to load the base map.

[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I guess YMMV, I just tried a few places around me (UK) and it found them all. You can also defiantly tap on a place to select it.

Did you try it recently or a while ago? I know it was pretty woeful when it came out but it’s improved a whole lot over the years.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

DDG AI chat is actually pretty decent, offers multiple options for free with no noticable limit; maps is dogshit agreed, still have to fall back to google, use uBlock and can remove the featured results on DDG.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I was more comparing how they push things on you, too. They're of course much nicer, in particular because you can just turn things off, which is how it ought to work. I don't mind things being default-on, most users would otherwise never realize stuff even exists. But it really needs to be able to be disabled, like how DDG allows it. (But sadly not for their godawful Apple Maps)

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah you're not wrong, I used DDG without uBlock the other day and it's basically become Google that "doesn't track you". Which I think is the main thing going for them. I wish they'd use OSM or something that's actually not slow as fuck.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’ve never noticed anything of what you describe. Perhaps they get filtered by uBlock. And isn’t the default Bing Maps for DDG?

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Sadly not. I wish. Or maybe it's per-country? Here in Germany it's all Apple. Apple Maps, Apple Weather, etc. And they're all equally terrible and seem to be extremely US-centric in their results.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kagi is better than all of them besides your own SearXNG setup. I’ve always thought DDG was bad, but man Kagi is like going back to the good ole days of Google in the 2000s.

[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wish Kagi wasn’t as expensive as it is.

If it was $5 a month for unlimited searches I would be all over it but 300 searches is too few and $10 is too much money.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I think the price won't come down until they get more subscribers. I agree that 300 isn't enough for any sort of software dev, but it's fine if you're careful about your searches. I went the first trial month keeping it under 300. When I started paying for 1000 then it was easy to keep it under that. Then they switched it to unlimited which is nice, but I still hardly ever go over 1k. If there was a 1k option I would definitely go with that since you only pay fractions of a cent per search after that so I would save money.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

is really does make more sense to just use Firefox and DDG

I take the point - but it doesn't make sense if you still prefer Chrome/Google to those overall and just want to change one aspect of it. This is just a way to improve the experience for people who are mostly happy with what they use and not interested in changing from it. It's great that we as users have that choice, that's how it should be.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

but youre asking for something thats effectively cosmetic filtering, a feature that google pushing Manifeat V3, for example removed ublock for having as a user feature. while its good to have a choice, you need to understand when you're effectively fighting against yourself by asking for a feature that was intentionally removed, and you could get back, had you werent deadset with siding with the company that killed the feature.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I'm not asking for anything. This isn't a support request. I found something I find useful and wanted to share it. That's all.

[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

First mistake is using Chrome second mistake is using Google.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I should have put that last line up the top instead...

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, this is Lemmy. It’s Linux, Firefox, DDG and pirate all intellectual property. Period. No exceptions.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Apparently so. Oh well, the info will still hopefully help people who're fine with their choices :-)

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is like those 20 minute videos for a problem that can be fixed in 20 sec

At the end of the day, if you keep using google, you will keep getting manipulated into what google wants you to. It may be fair, as it is free. Its a choice really. I pay a small amount to Kagi and have clean results with optional Ai if i feel like using it.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is like those 20 minute videos for a problem that can be fixed in 20 sec

Hence my TLDR. It's a 6-point bullet list (and the last one is optional).

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know.

Its an overcomplicated solution for a problem that doesnt really fix anything in the long run.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I never said it fixed anything in the long run. It allows me (and probably others) to do things the way I want to do them. If it doesn't apply to everyone, that's ok.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they meant "20 minutes" to mean a lifetime of always fighting google and "20 seconds" to mean switching to a different browser

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

a lifetime of always fighting google

I think that might just be verging on hyperbole, no?

[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you don't like the "extra nonsense", how about you stop using Google products? Namely Chrome and Google?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Feel like I covered that at the bottom.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Why would you need an extension for that? You can add other search engines right in the settings of firefox.

Edit: I was wrong, this is a feature Librewolf adds in their builds.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

No you cant. Engines either need to support the "OpenSearch" standard, which is useless because it only works for a few and only for default configuration.

Or they need to have an Extension themselves, which is a silly concept.

Instead, this addon uses a URL (as it is supported in Firefox Mobile, Chrome, Brave, Edge, ...) and converts it to an OpenSearch Search engine which you can then add.

Afterwards you can remove the Addon.

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, you can. You just enter a url, and put the %s somewhere in the query params which firefox will replace with your query.

I just tested this with my own website, which definitely does not support any OpenSearch standard, and it works exactly like you'd imagine (except the page doesn't exist of course).

Edit: nevermind, turns out this is a librewolf thing. Sorry about that

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

Librewolf supports custom OpenSearch engines? Cool?

Didnt know that. Firefox should absolutely support this again, needing an Addon is embarrassing

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Firefox supports custom search on iOS mobile.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 6 points 3 months ago
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

You can also use startpage which just proxies your search queries and doesn’t return the AI answers.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I actually like the ai answer box

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's fair enough - as long as users have options then all good as far as I'm concerned :-)

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why don't you like the AI answer box (other than it being wrong sometimes)?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Partly it's aesthetic - it takes up so much room!

Partly it's preferential - I'm not keen on machine generated answers being prioritised over actual sources.

Mainly though it's because when I do a search, I usually know what website I expect/want to get to, and just want that available to click immediately.