this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
40 points (90.0% liked)

Games

32513 readers
1165 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Let's charge full on handheld console money for a device that can't function away from a PS5!"

This should be doa but it's a PlayStation, it'll probably sell 30 million.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I suspect they may have chosen just the right price. People have paid more than this for controllers that don't come with a screen attached.

[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's more for enthusiast hardware. People pay $1000 for keyboards, but that doesn't mean they'll drop $200 for a remote streaming device.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's literally the same price as the dualsense edge. You overestimating the capacity for reason among "console enthusiasts".

[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like I said, I'd consider that enthusiast level hardware. People who game "professionally" or love real flashy things. You can also spend $1000s to make coffee, or get a $10 French press.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So what's your point? That people who will pay this price do exist, or that they don't?

Because now I feel like you're trying to claim the former, to argue the latter.

[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A streaming device is not enthusiast hardware.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, I'm confused, are you saying there are people who will buy this, or not?

And that's a subjective and arbitrary claim. It has no logical merit in arguing for or against whether people will consider this thing worth the price.

[–] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not, but I think the point has been lost at this point so let's just move on.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Ok. I was confused because then your argument essentially becomes "there are people who will spend a lot of money on their hobbies and professions due to intense emotional investment, but not on this".

I agree that the device, based on what we know, is dumb as hell, but I am also pretty sure, that a lot of playstation players will buy, and even enjoy, this thing.

I mean, I use my SteamDeck ten meters from my PC, just so I can play on the sofa instead of an office chair for a bit.

[–] Durandal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yes... I too have heard of the Wii-U

[–] impiri@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I am absolutely gonna spend $200 and countless hours of frustration to get this thing to run Yoshi’s Island at ~20 fps

[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It feels very overpriced considering it's just a streaming device and doesn't have OLED.

A hacked Switch with PS Remote Play makes more sense. Heck even a PS Vita has OLED and already supports Remote Play from a PS5.

[–] Spacellary@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

Vita 2 when...

[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

https://wasteof.money
(no promotion, just like this domain)