this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
104 points (94.8% liked)

Linux

48349 readers
608 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So it's no secret that some parts of the army in the USA and my country (UK) sometimes use legacy software like DOS for niche roles as they're robust including older versions of Windows.

But.. where does Linux fit in this? It's a kernel OS that's used in top of the line supercomputers, workstations, medical equipment and weather stations.

I imagine some aspects of this would be military secrets but how do they use it? I know that Linux was used for certain space projects with NASA but I'm talking about army applications.

TLDR : Does the penguin OS power shooty shooty machines and tanks

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 53 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've heard that the DoD uses RHEL pretty extensively. RHEL in the US Military

That article says that the US military has the largest single install base for RHEL in the world, but that was about 15 years ago, I don't know if that's still true.

Apparently back then the US nuclear sub fleet and its sonar systems also ran on RHEL.

I suspect lots of military hardware runs some form of *Nix or BSD type system. Many embedded systems run some *Nix type OS, and a huge portion of the developed world's weaponry is smart, so it it full of low power embedded systems and custom SoCs.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Red Hat has long benefitted from being the primary enterprise Linux company based in the US (no, we don’t count Oracle). SUSE created US-based Rancher Government Solutions to get some of that business and it seems to have been getting a lot of interest, despite being early days. They did a good job of focusing on modern technologies and immutable systems.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

I'm super excited to see SLES more in the US government space with RGS. RedHat was my goto champion of FOSS in public sector but since they have gone less Libre/FOSS SUSE is last big commercial Linux company still going commuting to FOSS.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 51 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Don’t look too deeply into this unless you’re comfortable discovering that the military and security state is a prolific contributor to many open source projects.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

SELinux was a product of the NSA. Maybe the best thing that agency has done.

[–] Mixel@feddit.de 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They also created ghidra! Probably second best

[–] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Also PRISM. Maybe the third—wait, wrong side of the array—worst.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 months ago

I don't find that problematic as they are the ones how are likely to push for good security and reliability

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Check out the World of Tanks forums for information.

[–] biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago

Oh you got a good chuckle out of me

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 months ago

https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-Hats-decade-of-collaboration-with-government-and-the-open-source-community

When we rolled into Baghdad, we did it using open source. - Major General Nicholas Justice

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There are many reasons Microsoft software is only "good" (and I'm using that word loosely) in business and home settings. Can you imagine a rocket taking off and windows suddenly "rebooting to complete updates" (or whatever it is that it says along those lines)?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Rockets probably use a dedicated OS that is safety validated. Getting something validated for critical operations is a massive endeavor.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Correct, missiles use something like RTEMS, which is named because it was used for missiles (no really, it originally stood for Real Time Executive for Missile Systems) and the operating demands for missiles have to be real-time given their unique edge cases.

Disclaimer: I worked on RTEMS in College

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Not only is it hard to get certified for things like rockets but they usually use a realtime os like red hawk (a red hat fork).

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'll watch it right now and come back. BRB.

Edit: now I have to "arrr" that series and watch it. 🤣🤣

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Running a full OS on a rocket? Why? It's mostly some embedded stuff, some kind of arduino.

The launching platform though... maybe a minimalist OS with a curses interface.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

That's a real brain fuck. Now I need to go research this.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It depends on what side you are on. At the end of the day a tool is a tool

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I said such things too, but one day I ask myself, could I said it in front of people bombed by my tools ? Our tools are not neutral things, but produce and distribute by social relationship that we could fight. Sorry but we the rise of fascism and ecological disaster we could not afford to give up our power as producer to mass murderer

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Greek military uses Linux Mint, so yeah, it's used in some places. I believe the Indian one does too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KrapKake@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Well I know my local army base (US) was looking for Linux sys admins, so I figure they have some servers on base.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

as they're robust

I would argue they are just what was used during development. After that, it never changes.

Why did they use it back then? Were there many alternatives? I do not know.

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I haven't done any work for the military but i can say that all the legacy systems I've worked on were because the specific software they need was written only for Windows 98 and the developer or company that created it is long gone. Keeping it going is a chore but switching to literally anything else is out of the question.

I could see for military applications that having the known quantity of a working piece of software that isn't changing anymore and can be swapped as an entire unit is an advantage, especially if it doesn't touch the internet in any capacity. But eventually you run out of people who know what to do if any changes need to be made.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

COBOL has entered the room... although i've heard Ada is more popular in military applications.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

It probably depends how many billions are going into it.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

For stuff that is still maintained but also legacy, military and contracting benefit from being a pretty insular community. Contractors are full of military retirees. What this does is give a pool of people who worked with the products for a very long time on one side who move over into maintaining them on the other, less knowledge is lost. It still happens and things must change eventually, but they manage to delay things where someone else like a bank might have a harder time when their knowledgeable employee leaves and they’re hiring people off the street.

[–] earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago

We used it as OS for the tank and airplane simulators, just because it made them cheaper compared to buying 500 Windows licenses

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I imagine they use it in much the same way as any enterprise. Running servers and workstations, mostly.

F16's run Kubenetes clusters.

Lots of individual bits of hardware on specialized devices will be running embedded operating systems. QNX is big in automotive for the same reasons it'd work on a rocket.

[–] philpo@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

Also big in healthcare/medical products,btw.

[–] hillosipuli@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Linux is commonly used in the communications systems, like on invidual radio "stations". Propably used everywhere where high confidentiality and security is required.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Didn't they at one point use a bank of PS3s when they still allowed for Linux boot options?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I'm not sure about the military, but yes a number of researchers used PS3s for cheap computing power.

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Most of that information is actually publicly available.

Stuff like this https://www.usaspending.gov/search/?hash=624182a957cfea14bc90717fb91ec1f8

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Looks like that are switching over from a generic Linux into android

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I saw a youtuber once reviewing the distro that the Russian military uses. It had some crusty retro desktop environment iirc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kiara@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Linux distro NixOS is used by mil-tech company Anduril

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've heard of Palantir, now Anduril... What's next, Saruman Ltd.? Uruk-Hai-corp? Poor Tolkien doesn't deserve his mythology being co-opted by war profiteers. :(

[–] Mike1576218@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

BTW: Anduril is a startup from Luckey Palmer, the guy that built the Oculus VR headset in his garage. The later sold Oculus to Meta for 2 billion $. 3 ex Palantir guys started Anduril together with him.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Turkish military uses Pardus, a Turkish Linux distro, but I'm not sure to what extent.

[–] fratermus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When I was in the army the S1 desk jockeys were using dedicated word processors with 8" floppies. Get off my lawn! :-)

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Knowing what the army is like, that could have been in 2010 lol

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm not so worried about stormtroopers using linux as much as guns, bombs, prisons, cops, torture, genocide, nukes, etc.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why are you asking? Yes it is used but obviously the exact systems are kept secret. As far as I know it is a mixed environment. I do know the US Air Force uses Kubernetes

[–] Tekkip20@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I ask because using the funni penguin kernel in a weapons grade equipment is funny

load more comments
view more: next ›