this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
161 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
5725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Solar modules are cheap, why not integrate them into the car? I'd love to get an extra 6 miles of range on my leaf per day just for being in the sun.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps, but repair expenses will certainly be crazy high.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Awesome. I hope they succeed.

[–] pudcollar@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similar story to Aptera Motors, they collapsed and reformed in 2019 and they're raising money to put out a solar EV.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess… Aptera’s vehicle is much more innovative and much closer to production. What makes this car interesting? I can’t find the specs but it looks like a regular vehicle with solar on the roof which I don’t think is a very practical idea.

[–] Rednax@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

About 80% of all effort for the Lightyear cars is in efficiency.

You have the obvious, like weight and aerodynamics. But also things like in-wheel motors, which are much more efficient than normal electrical engines, since there are almost no mechanical losses. Or the rear-view camera's, which save a lot of energy on air-resistance.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting. I hope it works out but I’m a bit skeptical that the conventional car chassis is practical for solar power barring some big improvements in technology. It just doesn’t have enough surface area compared to its weight and drag profile. If they pull it off that would be great but I’m skeptical they can build such a car at that price point.

[–] utubas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm, turns out this article was published on the 7th of April...

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cars are an inconvenient and silly location to place solar panels. This concept is just adding engineering complexity that need not be.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, it's a device that's already fitted with huge batteries, so it makes sense to put them on something that can be charged

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sigh..

No, it doesn't. Just because something 'appears' to make sense to laymen, doesn't mean it continues to make sense when you follow through with an investigation.

It doesn't make sense. If your goal is to make a crappier version of both a solar panel and a car, sure. But the amount of power you are going to get from the tiny amount of panels you can put into a car versus the massive power consumption they require is negligible. All your assumption shows is that you understand neither solar panels, nor cars.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

You should see a therapist.

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Solar modules are cheap, why not integrate them into the car? I'd love to get an extra 6 miles of range on my leaf per day just for being in the sun.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like I shouldn't have to explain something so obvious/ easily googled, but here is a write up that explains it.

Quite simply, we should make solar panels that are good and meet the need of what it takes to be a good solar panel.

We should make cars that are good cars and meet the needs of what it takes to be a good car.

A car with a solar panel meets neither of these requirements. Its a stupid way to do both. You are introducing un-neccessary engineering issues to make both a) a worse car, and b) a worse solar panel. Your panels need to now be structural and able to protect the occupants. You've also made the car heavier and less efficient. Also, how about when the car is fully charged? How useful are those panels? What good are they doing anyone? If your answer is to send their power to the grid, why did we ever put them on the car in the first place when we can just power the grid with solar and then put the energy into the car?

Solar panels on cares are a dumb idea. It takes only a few moments of thinking it through to understand that. Also, powering the grid with solar, and then powering your car from the grid IS a solar powered car.

[–] slumberlust@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your comment has a huge asterisk next to every point: for now*

Mp3 players, gps, and rollodexes all were superior until they weren't. Now they are trivial components of something we carry everywhere all the time.

The same is true of current solar capabilities. The future is multifaceted and we get there sooner when people try.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Sure. These are 'for now' points. But every improvement will also improve existing infrastructure and methods, so the most likely outcome will be that it will still make more sense to have solar panels be one thing, and a car be a separate thing.

Now a tow-behind RV pulled by an electric truck, that once parked can deploy its panels and charge the truck/ power the RV? That would make a ton of sense. But just in general, we can keep solar panels much simpler if all that needs to happen is they get mounted on something tall enough to not be blocked by the sun.