this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
802 points (96.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

29643 readers
1030 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Like, I'm on a plane. I don't want to watch Toy Story when I can do that at home, I want to see what the pilots see. And that way every seat has technically a window to look out of.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1luv8008135@lemmy.world 160 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Many do now. They shut it down prior to landing which sucks.

[–] teft@startrek.website 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Some of them show landing too. I had one that show us descending through a fog bank that was crazy. I don't know how those pilots do it, balls of steel I guess.

[–] debounced@kbin.run 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ILS :-)

But you have to trust the instruments and not become disoriented, takes lots of training and practice.

[–] xilophor@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or Autoland or a HUD landing which both can go down to 0/0, conditions permitting. There's a lot of tools these days that pilots (especially Air Transport Pilots) can use to fly. And yes, all of it requires fairly extensive training.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After watching Mentour Pilot I have an appreciation of just how much training they undergo. It's basically the closest thing we have to a real Starship Enterprise type setting where the captain seems to have an answer to everything that comes up, because that's precisely what they aim for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teft@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

And yes, all of it requires fairly extensive training.

Pffft I've played Flappy Bird. How hard can it be?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I actually have my private pilots licence. Had bought a Piper arrow that was IFR rated. I am not rate IFR but my instructor was.

Flew one flight to a small airport during real IFR conditions with my instructor. Uses GPS for localizer and glideslope. This particular airport minimum was 200 feet. That means if you don't see the runway by 200, you abort. Anyhow the cloud layer was started at 5000 right down to 300 feet. Was beautiful day with zero turbulence. When we entered the clouds, it literally felt like you were not moving and just in a heavy fog. Your engine is even decreased and quiet as you are descending. You watch the instruments like a hawk because it is easy to lose spacial orientation and death comes shortly after that. The only really movement is watching your attitude decrease which is very eerie. Being we were flying into an unmanned airport, for all you know the clouds go right into the ground so watching for the abort attitude is critical. In this case the cloud layer was particularly low at 300 feet. We broke thru the clouds with 100 feet to spare before abort attitude. Literally about three seconds later we were starting the flare and landing.

You literally rely on your instruments 100 percent and hope that altitude indicator is right on. You have a minimum of two attitude indicators. If they were both to fail in real IFR conditions, conditions where you can't see the horizon, very few pilots will survive. You can't feel the horizon at all. There is no way to tell if you are level.On the ultimate failure, you can use slew, altitude, turn indicator, worried to try and fly out of the condition. But few pilots could successfully do that for any extend time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Evilschnuff@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

The A350 with Lufthansa for example had it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zolidus@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

Why not in addition to as opposed to instead of?

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I love to have a window seat and just can't take my eyes off the landscape below. It's so amazing to see the plan of farms and cities, the aquaducts and rivers, the crinkled mountains deserts and coastline. Sometimes you can see the shadow of your own plane trace along the ground. Try to guess which lake this is. I guess a night flight is boring.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ever since I took an atmospheric science class I've come to love the view even when we're above the clouds. I try to identify cloud formations and guess whether it might be raining/snowing below. Seeing a big ol' cumulonimbus from that vantage point is cool as hell.

Also, seeing the wing control surfaces moving.

[–] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me on my flight from Seoul to Stockholm: "oh look, grassy plains. I must be over Russia!"
13 hours later: "oh would you look at that, more grassy plains, still over Russia 😒" Flying over Russia is like flying over the ocean except it's grass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Agree. Ocean flights are boring as well.

[–] Pantoffel@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

If only my neck wouldn't hurt so much after staring

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really enjoy watching the features of the desert when I fly to Vegas. You can almost see the geographic history of how the grand canyon came about. I love the dried up river beds that look like ancient crooked highways.

[–] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I fly from Indianapolis to Los Angeles once a year and love this as well. See the topography change over plains states…sometimes the Rocky Mountains if there is a layover in Denver or something. The Grand Canyon and cool landscapes in Utah. Maybe over Vegas/desert…Death Valley. The Sierra Nevada mountain range and “high desert” in California. Then the Pacific Ocean. Kind of amazing and people take it for granted.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JimmyDean@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago

One of the coolest experiences of my life was flying back to Portland from Chicago at night. Somewhere along the way, I looked out the window and off in the distance I noticed a lightning storm over a town. It was surreal how much lower the storm was than we were flying, and watching the lightning bolts branch out from the clouds to spread all over the place was just incredible.

I don't fly often, so maybe that's more common than I realize, but I thought it was pretty awesome.

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They did on one flight I was on. You could choose from a number of different cameras around the plane and watch the view. Short of take-off and landing, it was pretty dull.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most people don't care. I seem to be the only passenger on the entire flight that looks out the window. Idk why people are so indifferent to the amazing things in their lives, but they are.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

I once saw the northern lights from the airplane window. We flew from Amsterdam to Seoul and back then the route went over Russia. We went far enough north that a faint green glow was visible in the distance.

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I just want to sleep and get it over with. Flying has become hellish for me . Everything sucks. The cost, the lineups, the hassle of security, the delays, the price of a bottle of water, the horrible service, the discomfort...

[–] Devion@feddit.nl 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

BUT YOU'RE FLYING! You are sitting in a chair. In the air!!! You're like a Greek god right now.... YOU ARE FLYING!!

I swear the Wright brothers would kick us all in the cunt right now if they knew... "Hey Orville, they're gonna make us wait on the runway a bit." "O shit, it hardly seems worth it then."

[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was copied from a Louis CK bit btw. Around 1:16 from this:

https://youtu.be/b3dYS7PcAG4

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 9 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/b3dYS7PcAG4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sometimes there's a map, but I wish it had landmarks. Is that cluster of lights in the distance Chicago or Salt Lake? Sorry, the map only shows the origin and destination cities.

[–] HeapOfDogs@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I was on an international flight recently and the map was great. It had an sorts of zoom and different visualizations with landmarks. Really good. Only downside was realizing we were passing something cool and I couldn't see it because no window.

[–] CyprianSceptre@feddit.uk 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember international flights that had several outside cameras, one looking slightly down and forward was the best by far, although most of the flight it was just clouds and during landing that one turned to face forward so you couldn't see the runway. Haven't seen them recently though.

[–] helmet91@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Emirates has such cameras, one looking downwards and one mounted somewhere in front of the rudder, looking forward. Maybe there's a third camera as well, I don't remember. I flew in 2019 last time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I’ve often fantasized about a 360 cam mounted on the tip of the vertical stabilizer, and then the crew can offer VR headsets that put you “in” the 360 lookout. It’d be like flying while sitting on top of the plane! Cool even in clouds / inclement weather. Could even stream those feeds to the public for cheap tours of the skies. Would be extra interesting during landing and takeoff, I think. Maybe have a few cams around the plane. Bottom, top, each wing, cockpit, etc.

[–] daed@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I can't remember off the top of my head, but there is at least one airline/airplane that offers a live camera from the tip of the rear stabilizer to those displays. VR is of course a bit much currently, but it would be an awesome experience, no doubt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mickeypeach@feddit.uk 22 points 1 year ago

Emirates do this, there is a choice of three cameras.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's even the point of having a view from the cockpit if I can't drive the plane? Forget the crappy movies and games, if you truly want me to not be bored just stream to me control over the flight console.

[–] doomer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

twitch plays pokemon, airliner edition

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean that sounds cool but that would get boring pretty quickly.

Definitely would be cool on takeoff and landing.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unless it suddenly isn't boring.

Another jet zooms right beneath/above you.

Pilot banks to avoid birds and hit a few.

Suddenly the feed turns off and pilots come on the PA and ask folks to buckle up.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Makes me miss the trains that had on board entertainment that allowed you to steam a camera feed from the front of the train

[–] happyhippo@feddit.it 17 points 1 year ago

Emirates does this, at least on theor A380s.

And as someone said, apart from takeoff and landing, it's pretty boring.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

There is absolutely fucking nothing to see at 40,000 ft.

[–] FiftyShadesOfLatte@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Air France offers this feature at least on international flights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fsniper@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Done airlines give you outside views, but shoot with potatoes. So it's better not having that. Also there is nothing to see at most of the cruise height.

[–] hellishharlot@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah except the cloud layers. For some that's beautiful and it makes an even better backdrop for reading

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly that's fucking brilliant. It should be an option of course, not the default, but definitely would be really cool for those who want it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can already see the nothing and clouds out the side window. You think the front is gonna be different? At least you can also look down below out of the side windows. You can't really look at the ground from the cockpit. Well, I mean... You can, but it's not very fun because you have to point the nose of the plane down.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's basically just a windows desktop background.

load more comments
view more: next ›