this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
69 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
339 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

80G sounds like it could be nothing. They should probably be more specific about what kind of data.

[–] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

80 GB zip file... Thats likely over 150 when decompressed, and the amount of personal data (wich is usually just text) could include basically everyones personal data, or all company secrets including source code and everything. Or maybe even both...

People are used to gigantic shit files nowadays, but text is very small, without pictures, audio or videos this could be a unholy amount of confidential material.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It could be 90GB it could be a terrabyte.

Could be one 4k porn too.

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Internal data, not user data.

[–] dawnerd@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article says what’s likely in it as was previously disclosed from the hack.

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you share what it says?

[–] dawnerd@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Of course:

At the time of the hack, Reddit said hackers had used a “sophisticated and highly-targeted” phishing attack to get access to internal documents and data, including contact information for employees and advertisers. The company maintained that the hackers hadn’t accessed user data that wasn’t public.