65
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

While I was in the shower, I thought of a brilliant idea! Let’s trigger several smaller volcanic eruptions that release a semi-controlled amount of volcanic ash into other atmosphere. That will cool down the atmosphere, which should buy us some time to fix our carbon emissions.

Then I realized, that doing so would block visible light. Plants need the light to grow, and we need the plants to breathe and eat. Obviously, this is not going to be a long term solution. Oh, and how do you even make sure the volcanic eruption doesn’t spiral out of control and suddenly spew out 50 times the ash we were aiming for. Oh, and volcanoes also spew CO2 and even nastier gases, so… It sounded so good while I was still in the shower. The more I think about it, the worse it gets.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 75 points 3 months ago
[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

What do you say if you want the trees up?

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Totally forgot about nukes.

[-] ricdeh@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

This is called Geoengineering, and we don't need volcanoes for that. Current approaches mostly consider injecting sulfates or other reflective aerosols directly into the atmosphere to influence how much solar radiation reaches the Earth. The principle is the same as behind volcanoes. This method is in fact already being employed and has been used in the past, albeit only for regional climate engineering.

Why don't we do this to stop climate change? As you yourself kinda noticed, the consequences could be very unpredictable and dangerous because the effects are difficult to model. However, maybe after everything else has failed Geoengineering could be a viable option.

[-] Discover5164@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

basically snowpiercer

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

If we could selectively reflect only IR, but not visible light, then I might be more convinced.

[-] ClemaX@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

But the aerosols would also amplify the green house effect right?

[-] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

There are actually anti-greenhouse gasses like SO₂ (of acid rain fame(!))

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_aerosol_injection

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

This brings up an important point. Greenhouse effect is not the only factor in global temperature changes. There’s also solar input rate which varies enormously with cloud cover.

[-] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 months ago

geo engineering is a stopgap solution. it enables the continuation of fossil fuel burning, and rampant over consumption. it does nothing to prevent ecosystem collapse in our oceans, decline of breathable air or extinction of native species.

when you hear “geo engineering”, think of “clean coal” and “sustainable aviation fuel,” because they are one and the same

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I personally want to see humans invest in geoengineering but not for climate change. I believe geoengineering research and development will lead to terraforming which we'll need to expand beyond the earth.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

You’re right. Naive shower me thought that we could buy some time to do the right thing. Should have put on an oil billionaire top hat for a while to see how we could waste that time instead.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I still giggle at the idea of trump scrubbing a piece of coal with a toothbrush as a demonstration.

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social -1 points 3 months ago

And, just like people who install solar panels on their homes tend to use more energy than people who do not, finding a tricky way to buy additional time for us will only exacerbate and prolong how long we are destructive as a species to the planet that we live on.

[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Surely if that statistic is true it can't mean that on average after solar panels are installed people are taking more energy from the grid. I imagine it's also pretty easy to single out individual groups, like software engineers or something, who on average might use more electricity or reverse that and say people who use more electricity on average are more likely to get solar panels installed.

I only bring this up because sustainable energy initiatives, even individuals installing a handful of panels, should be praised. There's nothing better we can do right now than clean up our energy generation (and maybe go vegetarian? Lol).

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

This guy thinks we can control volcanoes.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Happy campers are poopin their Pampers

[-] Quazatron@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Upvote for you, dear PUSA fan!

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

You get some paper machet, you get some altroids, you drop in some diet coke, and BOOM! You got a 4th grade science teacher failing you because you did the project wrong, and (airquotes) "didn't pay attention".

..........what were we talking about.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Quality shower thought. Once you leave the shower, and give it some more thought, you can also flush the idea down the drain.

[-] manderson1701@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago

Maybe take a bath next time!

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

More water, more ideas. What could go wrong.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Isn’t this what happened in the Matrix?

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

It’s exactly what happened in the Matrix. Cypher turned on that volcano, and it solved global warming. Good job Cypher.

[-] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago
[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

ONCE AND FOR ALL.

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

We don't know who struck first, us or them. But we do know it was us that scorched the sky. At the time, they were dependent on solar power. It was believed they would be unable to survive without an energy source as abundant as the sun.

[-] xoggy@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago

If you want to make a shade without choking life to death how about a big parasol in space? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_sunshade

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Ideally, it would allow plants to get the visible light, but block much of the heat. I don’t know which material would do the trick though. Maybe some sort of glass could work as a band pass filter.

[-] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Watch Snowpiercer

[-] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 3 months ago

At least the "how" should be easy: drop Tsar Bomba down Old Faithful, and set off the Yellowstone caldera.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

What could go wrong. Literally nothing. It’s scientifically impossible for any part of this plan to cause any problems at all.

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Have you read the Mistborn novels, by any chance? That's more or less what would happen, only without the cool metal magic

[-] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Man, the fact that

Tap for spoilerThe mist they were so scared of didn't actually harm plant growth, and the Lord Ruler fucked up the ecosystem for nothing
was something. Also, I don't think our plant life would adapt nearly well enough to sustain human life if it happened to us.

Tap for spoilerBesides, those humans were genetically engineered to survive off shit nutrients, at least on the main continent.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

It happened again. I get a great idea, and later find out that, not only someone else thought of it first, but they also made it into a product many years ago.

[-] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Lord Ruler, is that you?

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

This could cause a lot of acid rain

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah… Among all the other disasters it could cause. Probably not the safest idea, now that I think of it.

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ha that's a shower thought!

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Should have also posted this in LinkedIn. Some of those aphorism are actually dumber than my idea, so it should fit right in.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
65 points (90.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

29239 readers
534 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS