this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
546 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12373 readers
338 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 208 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Any company that intentionally underpays their employees so that they require govt assistance to live should be billed the full cost of all assistance that employee receives.

[–] piracysails@lemm.ee 79 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think that minimum wage being a livable salary, is less complicated.

[–] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 months ago

I imagine that's part of their point? At least that is how I took it.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

UBI could be even less complicated. If everyone were guaranteed a livable income, a minimum wage might not even be necessary.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 7 points 6 months ago

I like Scott Galloway's take: SPEAK THEIR LANGUAGE!

Call UBI a negative tax and Republican voters will listen.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Just enough to pay rent and utilities. Then only corporations will own property.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago

Billed double. Make it hurt.

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

*should be nationalized and sold off, and its mismanagers prosecuted

[–] ragica@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

The wealthy NEED the airports to keep running so not to interfere with their vacation plan. Starving kids on the other hand can simply be rewoven as doormats by any good capitalist.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 152 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm GLAD we not only BAILED THESE COMPANIES OUT WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS and also DON'T TAX THEM but we ALSO get to Pay Their Employees!

-Republicans who don't want to use their Tax Dollars to Feed Starving American Children.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Why would we feed starving children when they're just going to grow up being underpaid employees on welfare?!

[–] adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev 134 points 6 months ago (4 children)

How is being paid "from pushback to arrival" even vaguely legal?

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 92 points 6 months ago (2 children)

When you have money you get to write the laws.

Remember when a letter from an airline exec was all it took for the cdc to reduce COVID sick leave? PFR...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

Even fast food restaraunts in airports pay a higher hourly rate to compensate the staff for the added pain in the balls for getting to work.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

they're salaried? only thing I can come up with.

If they're infact hourly... then work is work, and they're working off the clock.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They're hourly. I still can't believe this is legal.

Edit: found an article on it. Spoiler: it's legal because the government makes all sorts of exceptions for airlines. Their unions even have to get government permission to strike!

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/02/12/flight-attendants-don-t-earn-their-hourly-pay-until-aircraft-doors-close-here-s-why/

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Thank you Railway Labor Act of 1926. It's actually not all bad, but it does put railway and airline workers in a different class. It all depends on how the National Mediation Board is feeling that day.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Been that way forever. Parking brake release with door closed was the standard for a long time. Now they have parking systems on the terminal that sense the aircraft and don’t start the clock until the aircraft pushes back, and stop the clock as soon as it’s parked even if you’re sitting there for 30 minutes waiting for the jet bridge or whatever.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but they also used to have a good enough pay that it was still an okay deal, even if the clock only ran during aircraft movement. It's still the case with other airlines I have an old friend that went to work for Etihad and he seems to be doing fine. Tells me about the nice weekends away all over the world during rest time, lives in a nice apartment in Dubai with a view, etc. Granted I'd never want to live there but I'm sure you can achieve similar lifestyle with other international airlines (Singapore, KLM, etc etc).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 89 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If your boss requires you to be somewhere at a specific time.. then that is work .. right?

And being on the other end means you are still at work. It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 84 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

You had a government mandated floor on prices until the 70's in the USA and the 90's in the EU, which meant that airlines had to compete on amenities and other ways to pull traffic to their airline. Once that price floor was removed, it became apparent that ticket prices were what drove most traffic, so airlines started doing whatever they could to drop ticket prices.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Nice write up, thanks. TIL.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 75 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I hope the unions give these bastards a nice, swift kick in the ass.

If anyone should be taking a pay cut, it's the shitty CEO's whose decisions make flying a miserable experience.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If this were in a free country, sure. But these unions need government permission to strike.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I didn't know that.

Ain't that a fucking bitch.

[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Welcome to "democracy"

[–] TomMasz@kbin.social 55 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nobody wants to work anymore.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

"Nobody wants to work anymore."

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I haven't flown in a while, have they already started asking us to tip flight attendants?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Remember, they're the ones that close the doors (or don't)!

[–] ramchak@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it is Boeing that decides if it stays closed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

guys does making airline workers unable to afford life make passengers less safe?

[–] NotSpez@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Time to unionize, I think.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

They are already

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

they are only set to warn little more than $27,000 per year before tax.

I know that writing is hard, especially when using AI, but please proof read your posts?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Oh no, a typo from hitting a key right next to the intended key, this has never happened in the history of journalism!

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Not only that, the the typo is a legitimate word, meaning it won't be flagged by spell check. HOWEVER, that's no excuse to not proofread a submitted article. In fact, it's more reason why one should.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thats has to be from the onion! ( I hope at least )

[–] Ozymati@lemmy.nz 10 points 6 months ago

But tHe inVisIbLe haNd

load more comments
view more: next ›