Not The Onion

12223 readers

863 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

Supreme Court: Drivers hauling baked goods are in transportation, not baking (finance.yahoo.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Late2TheParty@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

But the Supreme Court’s April 12 ruling that they are in the transportation business opens the door for them to take the dispute to court.

That’s because the FAA — in its very first section — exempts from its mandate several types of workers, such as railroad employees and “any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.”

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So after reading this, and please someone correct me, this is good for the workers, yes?

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

In this case yes, because transportation workers have special protections, but it can just as easily apply to strip transportation workers of rights given to bakery workers in different circumstances.

I think it's kind of neutral.

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For others with so many questions about the why of this case...

This ruling allows the independent contractors that deliver goods for a large bakery (Flowers Foods) to be exempt from arbitration requirements under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), and instead take their pay dispute to court.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Arbitration is death for the little guy’s negotiating power. It costs about $150 to pursue a claim in small claims court, and about $1500 to pursue a claim in arbitration.

For most individual earners in a pay dispute, that arbitration fee is insurmountable and essentially means they’re powerless.

I ran into this problem when I discovered the contract I’d hired a lawyer to draw up for my freelancing business had an arbitration clause. First time I had a client who wouldn’t pay, I was broke and therefore had no recourse.