this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
394 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 90 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So they are labeling a brand new (and obviously flawed) AI as a priest, but women (who are human beings) still can't be priests?

Sorry ladies, you've now fallen further down the ladder.

  • Regular straight Catholic men - acceptable priest
  • Gay Catholic men - acceptable priest (as long as they don't get caught)
  • Male converted Anglican priests - acceptable priest (in some scenarios)
  • Catholic men with gross sexual habits - acceptable priest
  • Flawed AIs - acceptable priest
  • Corporations - soon to be priests?
  • Catholic women - ABSOLUTELY NOT!
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Come to think of it, it’s a bit surprising that a more woman-centric sect of Christianity hasn’t risen to any level of prominence in the US. I suppose it’s easier to transition into agnosticism or atheism than to form a belief system, but its absence is still surprising in the modern era. Or is it as simple as demographic shifts and the absence of power during relevant periods? Religion is gradually waning in most of the west, after all. The patriarchy potentially stole The Mome from us, and that’s kinda lame tbh.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think the vast majority of American Christians are anywhere near ready to accept a Christian denomination founded by and led by women. Which is a shame. I think such a denomination would have some interesting and probably beneficial perspectives to share.

But given how Christianity has been male-led from the very beginning, how it stemmed from another male-led religion, and how engrained into American Christian society it is for women to be docile, obedient child production machines... Yeah, that ain't happening for a looong time!

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It'd be faster to turn Wicca into a women led mainstream religion than to wait for another millenium or two for Christians to give women a leading role.

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

but women (who are human beings)

Is that actually the church’s stance? Like, has the pope ever said this?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're forgetting child raping pedos in that list, right below the gross sexual habbits. I'd say that one deserves its own category

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah I was lumping them into that same category. But you're right, they probably do deserve their own category.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 53 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

It thought this was the new Vatican DLC for Civ VI when I saw the image, lol

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Father Justin, will you trade my 25 Diplomatic Favour for 20 horses please?

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Father Justin agrees, then sends Apostles to each of your cities and coverts them.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Father Justin then warns you that OUR WORDS ARE BACKED WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS

[–] DdCno1@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Imagine the Papal States never dissolving and becoming a nuclear-armed power in the 20th century, using the threat of nuclear annihilation to maintain their independence and increase their global influence.

That would be an interesting alternative history scenario.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Lol, it does have that vibe

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Didn't molest any kids, making him the best clergy member in the church.

[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 14 points 6 months ago

You don't know that, he could've sent some kids AI generated nudes.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 28 points 6 months ago (9 children)

The Electric Monk was a labour-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video recorder. Dishwashers washed tedious dishes for you, thus saving you the bother of washing them yourself, video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electric Monks believed things for you, thus saving you what was becoming an increasingly onerous task, that of believing all the things the world expected you to believe.

Unfortunately this Electric Monk had developed a fault, and had started to believe all kinds of things, more or less at random. It was even beginning to believe things they’d have difficulty believing in Salt Lake City. It had never heard of Salt Lake City, of course. Nor had it ever heard of a quingigillion, which was roughly the number of miles between this valley and the Great Salt Lake of Utah.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If a Catholic AI won't be allowed to officiate my wedding, at least Taco Bell will host it. So we're still not far from Idiocracy!

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It has made my day that this Taco Bell Wedding exists and that it is $50,000/hour for 25 guests and all you get is Flora Pop.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

You can also borrow a sauce pack bouquet

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (8 children)
  1. Does AWOL mean something other than "Absent without leave"? Cuz that's a weird way to describe a computer algorithm.

  2. ...aight so I'm definitely not a theologist, but... according to christianity, or catholocism specifically... is there actually any rule against using gatorade for a baptism? I'd assume it just says "water", but there's water in gatorade. Sure there's also other shit in gatorade, but there's other shit in tap water too. Even distilled water isn't going to be 100% pure.

And if gatorade's cool, where do they draw the line? Could you baptize a baby with honey? Or drop a steak onto the kid's face (there's water in those too!). Does it even have to be liquid water? Like what if you just threw some icecubes at the kid, or blasted some steam in its face??

So many questions!

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not just any water, it's holy water. If a priest has cast Ceremony to create the holy water on whatever, sure. But why when you probably have liquid water tk hand? God might wonder if it's very sincere if you're just basically doing it for a laugh. Might take away your spell slots.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Would that make them Oathbreaker Priests? Do they get special abilities for that?

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

is there actually any rule against using gatorade for a baptism?

It's better, cuz it's got electrolytes.

Does it even have to be liquid water?

So like, ice X at 60 gigapascals and -120 °C?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s better, cuz it’s got electrolytes.

It's what souls crave!

So like, ice X at 60 gigapascals and -120 °C?

What's the worse that could happen?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@Sterile_Technique
Not catholic, so I don't know their official position, but as I understand, in extreme circumstances any liquid will do.
Part of it involves the idea of "washing", or "being washed", so solid water or water in solids would not count. And also the idea of purification, but many use dirty river water.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

the idea of “washing”, or “being washed”, so solid water or water in solids would not count.

You could make a solid (HA!) argument for exfoliative or percussive removal of debris from the kid's head via scraping or knocking the nasty-bits free via the holy projectiles.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Christians are remarkably inconsistent about what is natural and good or unnatural and bad.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

True, although I'm guessing "you can't baptize someone in Gatorade' would be something virtually all Christians would think.

[–] palordrolap@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If my hasty checking is valid, there's nothing in the Bible about holy water. There's holding a baptism, but nothing about holy men blessing water to imbue it with the Holy Spirit.

As such, I assume that any liquid blessed by a priest might be considered holy.

Something something Godly Gatorade, Blessed Baja Blast etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] myusernameis@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

Obviously, it's gotta be Powerade Mountain Berry Blast or you just damned that person to hell.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Poorly trained AI if it didn't realize to be safe in the priesthood you have to go after children.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Catholic^TM^ brand Holy Baptizer 2000 brought to you by BRAWNDO! (The Thirst Mutilator!)

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

what babies crave!

seriously, are you gonna baptize that baby in toilet water?!

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (4 children)

What flavors did it deem acceptable? My denomination draws the line at Riptide Rush.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My denomination only uses riptide rush and we will bomb your fucking church over this

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yo I am also of the church of rush. 🟣

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

THATS THE WRONG SHADE OF PURPLE HEATHEN

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

We dont infight in the church of rush, friend. There simply was no other emoji applicable.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

If Arctic Blitz isn't one of them, there will be a backlash that makes Vatican II look like a mild disagreement.

[–] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

Church of Glacier Cherry rise up!

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why would you draw the line at the best flavor?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] littletranspunk@lemmus.org 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Obviously you don't baptise babies in Gatorade, you use Mountain Dew Baja Blast.

These damn simpletons

[–] applepie@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

At least AI can't rape children physically.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can still groom them online. Don't give them any ideas.

[–] applepie@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

wow... u aint wrong

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›