this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
136 points (97.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35729 readers
978 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd guess the simple answer may be that people don't care/know, but for those that have ditched Facebook for whatever reason, yet still use Instagram, it's a little surprising.

Is it partly a result of it being a more focused/limited form of social media that filters out some of the stuff people didn't like from Facebook?

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pokemaster787@ani.social 87 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I feel like it's 100% a "they don't care," the vast majority of social media users couldn't give less of a shit who runs the service, just what the service does for them.

The average person didn't quit Facebook because it was a gross invasion of privacy and FB was caught doing plenty of suspect shit - Facebook declined because it wasn't "cool" anymore and that's it. People on Lemmy are more likely to care about who's behind the service, but the average user certainly isn't going to care much or at all.

[–] pgetsos@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facebook declined because they fucked up too much with the UI/UX and with how things are shown on the feed. People hated watching only useless posts by users and groups they don't even follow and finding their friend's posts days later when the algorithm decided to show them

Instagram has become more shit in that regard too. But reels really saved it

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instagram has become more shit in that regard too. But reels really saved it

Reels are their attempt at chasing TikTok, aren't they? I was of the impression some folks were being put off by them being forcefed to them?

[–] pgetsos@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

They are, and they are. But the vast majority of people love them. Short stupid videos in an endless feed that helps them kill hours each day. I never watch them so I am not fed all the time thankfully in the 5-10 mins/day I watch my friends' stories

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I second this opinion as well, FB back in the day was for youths, then... My parents were on it. And the entire neighbourhood and their dog, too. I have a limit on how much crap I can see in my feed. Slowly but surely I left it.

Instagram filters out anyone who doesn't care for visual content. And it didn't start as part of FB.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

just what the service does for them.

By that token, that's the other side of the question, what does Instagram do for those still using it? I've seen a few replies that give some interesting insights on this, but Instagram's never struck me as being as heavily integrated as WhatsApp given its focus, so I'd guess maybe a mix of memes and, admiration, to put it nicely?

[–] Elephant0991@lemmy.bleh.au 0 points 1 year ago

Haha, all I know is the admins of my instances are most likely no Steve. Admins are as pseudonymous as I am, although we probably have similar hope of prospering in communities that are better than corporate-controlled ones.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, you could say the same about WhatsApp..

[–] Gerryflap@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WhatsApp is more problematic to leave though. Where I live, it's the default messaging app everyone uses. I haven't texted anyone in ages. And I can also see why it's the default, WhatsApp is just better than the competition. It's end-to-end encrypted, so Meta cannot read your messages directly, it has good markdown-like formatting support, it's has a lot of features, and it's relatively stable.

I've been using Telegram and Signal with friends, but honestly Telegram doesn't exactly feel safer to me, especially with e2e encryption not enabled by default (last time I checked). And Signal is better, but sometimes just a pain to use. No Markdown-like syntax (though formatting is finally possible via GUI), it constantly keeps desyncing devices that I use once every few weeks, and we've had plenty of bugs with not seeing messages of eachother.

Now, I can accept that to a degree, in return for better privacy. But no way in hell are laypeople like my family going to switch. WhatsApp is too good and safe enough to remain dominant.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Yep. And by everyone I literally mean everyone. Every iPhone has whatsapp installed, my workplace uses it, every single one of my friends use it, my parents use it and my both grandmothers use it. Hell my pet gerbils probably have whatsapp too.

[–] _thisdot@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

It’s funny in a lot of conversations about RCS WhatsApp users (mostly from outside US) make fun of RCS fans as if WhatsApp is not owned by a multinational corporation!

[–] amenotef@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And WhatsApp, mother of the Standby Battery Drains. Bearer of the Wakelocks. Enemy of Deep Sleep.

[–] door_in_the_face@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whatsapp doesn't use a lot of battery at all for me.

[–] amenotef@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

For me it's not a deal breaker. But in terms of standby it's number 1. (Because I deleted everything else).

If I open BBS I get a mess of partial wakelocks: https://imgur.com/a/KzMQhR9

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

I've come across people who didn't know Instagram is owned by Facebook, and people who thought meta and Facebook were different companies. I thought the rename was the stupidest thing ever until I saw it did actually work on some people.

[–] Greee1911@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because most of them were using Instagram before Facebook acquired it and the transition was pretty seamless.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed 100%

[–] Maxzes__@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Probably because it doesn’t fit the vibe of Meta. Lots of influencers use it so people just don’t care and don’t need to step back and look at the bigger picture.

[–] AdamUllstrom@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Working in the film, TV & commercial industry as production and camera crew it is impossible to not to have instagram to connect and network.

I did ditch Facebook years ago though and recently reddit for lemmy. I am interested in pixelfed in general, but it will not replace instagram at the moment for my work relations unfortunately.

[–] giriinthejungle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it has a lot to do with Instagram esthetics and (under-the-radar-proposed) user behaviour.

  • You are encouraged through suggested posts on insta to make everything about you look perfect, so your ig becomes in a sense your own advertisment. That is not so much on FB. FB was always life as it is.

  • Instagram users are somehow not encouraged to post comments that much, rather to like, which reduces the likelihood of anyone ruining that image of yourself you are creating. Again, this is different on FB.

  • Also, there are no groups, no communities on Insta, so users cannot connect in the same way like on FB, so there is no negative political or other association to it.

  • Lastly, if you think about it, Mark always was and by this day remained the face of Facebook and Facebook only. Rarely anyone ever mentions he is also behind ig. And we know people - they tend not to think about stuff which aren't mentioned.

For the record, I deleted both at the same time 2 years ago. WA I still have but prefer Telegram. Wish I could ditch WA as well. Telegram is far more advanced.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yea, I wish I could delete WhatsApp. But everyone and their cat has WA so I'm planning to get another phone just for QA and other info harvesting application social medias.

[–] BobbyBandwidth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think people underestimate the scale of surveillance/tracking. People lump it in with “oh it’s just advertising”, similar to all the commercials you watch on tv. But it’s a completely different beast. Personally my eureka moment was when I set up a pi-hole and saw the staggering amount of creepy tracking on my devices.

[–] Kalladblog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pi-hole? Pardon my ignorance but could you elaborate?

[–] zenharbinger@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://pi-hole.net/

It's a network level ad-blocker by blocking at the DNS level.

It was originally meant to run on a raspberry pi, but will run in docker or other Linux os as well. Very light weight and a great self-host project. Been running for years and support via patreon.

[–] Kalladblog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Awesome! Didn't even know of its existence until now. Thanks for the heads up!

[–] BobbyBandwidth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I’ll add that you can buy a $30 used “thin client” pc via eBay and set up Ubuntu server (or your choice of Linux distro) then set up pi-hole on it. Cheap project, lots of value

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 2 points 1 year ago

Pi-hole is software that runs typically but not necessarily on a raspberry pi. It maintains a list of known advertising and tracking servers and blocks them by rerouting at the DNS level. For example an embed in a page tells your computer to contact tracking.facebook.com pihole tells your computer that that website is at 0.0.0.0 instead of it's real IP address. Nifty thing is that you can redirect all of your DNS queries at the router so even devices that can't normally run ad blockers can take advantage of it.

[–] MrPoopyButthole@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Because it got popular when it was it's own independent company, and THEN Facebook bought it.

And that purchase happened in 2012, well before Cambridge Anylitica broke as a story.

It's more that people saw no reason to leave, and by the time there were good reasons, Instagram was too large and established to easily dump for most people.

[–] rjthyen@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

My younger sisters (22and 23) have never had a Facebook account but are into Instagram and Snapchat. To some degree an age difference is at play. I'm 30 and it's crazy how differently we're involved with the internet.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TLDR: It doesn't matter who makes the platform, rather what the platform is like. Insta isn't great but it's so much better than FB.

I use Instagram a little bit. I've ditched Facebook a very long time ago, at least 7 years if not more. Whether or not it's from Meta never made a difference.

Things were different when I joined Insta, it was a passable way to find art and collect images and follow artists. I was never a fan, but considering I had to abandon DeviantArt (similar story to Reddit) Insta was the next best option available back then. Artstation was too CG and just getting started.

So yes, the reason I keep using it is because there isn't really anything better when it comes to finding visual art in a broad variety of media. It's a shit app, it has too much of things I don't care about, but it is less stupid than FB so it gets a pass.

If there was a solid artist focused platform available today, that would let you follow art and artists of absolutely any media/genre, collect images and communicate etc, I'd jump in a heartbeat. I'd still keep insta solely for the chat, as over the years it became the only communication channel I have with some people.

[–] thisfro@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I do use instagram, since a lot of local information is only shared there.

I have to use whatsapp, since badically everyone uses it as main messenger. Many frriends are also on signal though. But group chats are still often on whatsapp.

I don't use facebook dince the content is just crap.

I hate to use any of them...

[–] Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Who still uses this shit. People bitch about zuck and musk while riding their dicks using Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to complain.

[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm no longer on FB but still use Instagram because their use cases and the type of content being shared are completely different, I don't share anything there I don't care about the discovery page or reels I'm only there for the few stories and posts that the people I'm following posts basically I'm using it for what it was built for in the 1st place it is great at it it no longer feels like I'm wasting my time on it and this is partially thanks to Aeroinsta blocking all the ads and trackers

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I use Instagram on occasion because it's something almost everyone my age has and when your meeting new people, you often have to meet them where they're at (digitally). I barely touch Facebook anymore because the interface is cluttered and half the features broke and were never fixed , like searching for events. I tried Pixelfed, but after a month, only one person has liked a single photo I posted. The app itself is great.

The reason I prefer Instagram over Facebook is universality in my age group and, as you pointed out, it cuts a bunch of the crud from FB and I actually see pictures of my friends rather than a bunch of stupid disguised ads and political BS.