this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
174 points (98.9% liked)

Reddit

13627 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 25 points 6 months ago (5 children)

How do we keep the bots out of Lemmy? Eventually all the AI rot will spread to the fediverse.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Defederate/ban them, defederate instances that don't adequately stop them from their instances.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That might work for now, but AI bots can easily create more content faster than human moderators can go through. We will need mechanisms to prove humanness.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 6 months ago

Another strategy might be to demand a minimum content quality. Whether trash comes from humans or bots, it’s still trash.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

They rarely get past the signup form, it's trivial to spot them.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

That's how you dismantle the current network in it's entirety

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Realistically, you don't. You can't really.

The only way would be to verify each account somehow.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yea, it will be a hard problem to solve. There’s no good solutions right now. Hopefully someone with the creativity and skill will come up with something.

[–] 50MYT@aussie.zone 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It becomes a pain vs gain problem. How hard do you make it, also balancing the inconvenience.

You could easily force users to enter a one time code via email every 3 months (or more or less time). This would be hard to automate and if you changed it up even more so.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe enforce login with a hardware token like Yubikey or Nitrokey. I don’t think you could automate that(?)

[–] 50MYT@aussie.zone 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but how do you get it to someone.

Pain vs gain.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 1 points 6 months ago

I’m not sure I understand. User would have to buy their own keys and set it up.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Are AI bots really the true problem, or is the problem product promotion? Humans can do that too.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yea, but AI bots do it at an unprecedented scale. The price of generating bullshit is practically 0. There is already cheap AI content every where and people are already getting tired of it. It’s true that human actors has done something similar for a long time, but now AI will make the process so easy that AI junk will be everywhere. Look at Google search results, it’s already filled with blogspam generated by AI. Blogspam was a problem before, but now it’s insufferable. Cheap midjourney “art” is showing up in search results even when you search for real classic artist, you get these ugly AI copies. Generative AI is the ultimate bullshit and spam machine.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 6 months ago

Thank you for the insightful response!

[–] Tregetour@lemdro.id 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Bots aren't the problem. You mistake the tool for its operator by cursing a bot. If I had a specific purpose for a bot, I'd use one. The difference between my using a bot and a clickfarmer using a bot is that I wouldn't treat Lemmy instances as a resource to be exploited (and ultimately ruined). Such an attitude would inform the how and the what behind my bot use.

The problem as always comes back to bad incentives, bad design and bad behaviour.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I identify with your problem as we are similarly, human people. Have you thought as I have in the past, "Why not let AI solve this problem for me?" I have used BotRemoverAI.co for this issue and the results have been highly acceptable!

[–] fantasty@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thank you for your suggestion kind stranger take my gold sir edit this blew up thank you for the award

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We are a community. The community will find a way as we can do anything. We have faith of the heart and everything.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 8 points 6 months ago

That sounds more like a prayer than a plan.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 21 points 6 months ago

It was like that before I left

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago

And it couldn't have happened to a nicer website.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Not surprising they've been social marketing with corporate accounts and purchased accounts for years because the know it's effective.

This is just the natural evolution of that.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this is one instance where I don't care that the human bots are being replaced with AI bots. I mean, it's even worse than before, but those "workers" don't have my support here.

[–] fantasty@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Astroturfers losing their jobs to AI. I imagine some poor guy coming home after a long day of warmongering and promoting nuclear energy, hanging up his coat: „honey, I’m home“. And the wife has prepared a beautiful dinner, it could be a wonderful day. „How was work today?“, the wife asks. And the guy has to tell her how he lost his job to the evil twin brother of ChatGPT because corporate has done the math and they realized that a bot can replace possibly hundreds of humans. It’s a tragedy really, how is the guy going to pay for his mortgage? How’s he gonna feed his family? I think astroturfers should unionize to combat this kind of automation. It creates harm to society.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a Kurt Vonnegut story in there somewhere. Or maybe someone more cynical.

[–] fantasty@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I‘m from Germany so had no idea about Kurt Vonnegut, just read through his biography and work and I think that’s the kind of story I had in mind. Definitely gonna read some of his work, seems highly relevant still nowadays.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

He's so good. Slaughterhouse 5 is the real classic he's known for.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Capitalism sure is having fun with AI

[–] Deebster@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not a regular there any more, but I feel like there's more "natural" spam posts nowadays. They're not natural enough that they haven't prompted me to check the account's post history (all mention product x, of course).

Edit: e.g. this one

If this is an example of the AI, it's not very good.

[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

LLMs don't generate that sort of templated response for conversation (although they do for software code).

It's more likely a traditional ad, using some classical algorithms perhaps.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Bitch, reddit is poisoning reddit.

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What is dead can never die

[–] Odinkirk@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

And in strange memory caches, even death may die.

[–] Wanangwa_Bamidele@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 months ago

Any summary bot ?