this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
71 points (97.3% liked)

Science

13175 readers
8 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Evolution is far slower than the climate has been changing. Many species have, and will suffer these consequences. We’ll probably wait until our food supply is threatened more than just a little unseasonable bird flu to really care.

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

Crops are already failing. As a species, we will do nothing but panic at the last moment and look to assign blame

[–] cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Always reactive, never proactive. That's humans for you!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Guarantee we’d be proactive if it were profitable.

[–] stiephel@feddit.de 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It is very profitable to be proactive. The climate crisis will cost trillions of dollars to "repair" and deal with. Taking the right steps at the right time is way cheaper. We really are too stupid as a species and it'll be our downfall.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

the heads are mostly the ones without incentive to care, and much incentive to keep the status quo

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Yes but corporations won’t pay for that, governments will. If a company could make a buck off of preventative measures, they’d be all over it.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

It is very profitable to be proactive

But is it profitable this quarter?

[–] cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

Absolutely.