Oh It's that time of year again where Cisco says the Cisco RV series is broken move off it.
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
43 points (97.8% liked)
Cybersecurity
5652 readers
51 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They should move to a service only business model. Or the business model where Oracle just sues you for daring to be their customer...
Am I reading it correctly that it only affects remote admin? Isn't that generally considered to be a Very Bad Idea? My home network has remote admin disabled, but with VPN access I can remotely manage it, which is (afaik?) a way more secure method than having public https access to your network gear...
Still pretty unimpressive by Cisco to basically just say "sucks to be you" to the owners. I get that it's EOL but still.
This seems kinda criminal