this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

9068 readers
55 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21-23 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Formula 1's chief technical officer has revealed new details of the biggest overhaul of the series' regulations in a decade.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] safesyrup@lemmy.hogru.ch 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Peak power, yes, the cars will have a thousand horsepower. On average, though, because of the conservation of energy and fuel flow limits. They will have an average power output of less than 600 horsepower, closer to 530 if I recall correctly. Enineering Explained made a good video about it. So overall I think saying the 2026 cars will also have 1000 hp is sort of misleading since it will only have that power available for very short amounts of time.

[–] NoRamyunForYou@lemmy.nz 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I really despise the whole Fuel Flow Limit thing, along with having tyres that have to be nursed too much I feel.

[–] safesyrup@lemmy.hogru.ch 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It depends. They have go limit the power of the cars somehow, and fuel flow limit is i think a good way to do that, because it promotes efficiency. Things like taking away electric energy recovery from the turbo seems stupid in contrast because it removes efficiency

[–] NoRamyunForYou@lemmy.nz 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. Genuine question, what are the main reasons for limiting the power? Is it due to safety?, managing costs? Theoretically, with so few engines allowed per season now, wouldnt it curb alot of the stuff that was happening with insane qualifying trims in the 80's as an example?

[–] safesyrup@lemmy.hogru.ch 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think the main reason is safety, yes. With more power you can add more downforce while not loosing out on top speed. I think 5 to 6 Gs of lateral acceleration in corners is already enough :D

As for your second question: technology, especially turbo technology and precision machining has come a long way within the last 40 years. I think the most extreme cases of qualifying trim in the 80s were 1.5 litre engines with 1200-1500 hp, and they literally only lasted for one single lap, or around 5 km.

Todays engines are 1.6 litres running at 900-1000 hp while doing multiple thousand km. Additionally, using more than 3 engines outweigh the penaltys with the performance gained.

[–] NoRamyunForYou@lemmy.nz 1 points 7 months ago

Can't argue with safety.

I wonder what would be the solution/ combination not solutions to give rise to races where drivers have to/ are able to push alot more for alot longer.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Engineering Explained

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

A lot of people don't realize a major objective of technical regulations is to intentionally slow the cars down and keep them below a particular speed.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'll be surprised if these cars get over 250 km/h at their fastest. Then again, I don't have access to their testing data, so take that with an ocean of salt.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

They still have access to 1000 BHP for short periods, while weighing less and having less downforce that will almost certainly result in less drag for most cars. I would not expect peak speed to be that much slower than now, just average speed over the lap.

Sure the drop to 6 gears from 8 (if it goes ahead) is going to hurt but not being able to use all 1000 BHP on the straight at somewhere like Monza means you'll just be a sitting duck all day long, RB have shown that when they had their biggest DRS advantage.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I expect the overall laptime to be about the same as current after a couple seasons. I'm just guessing too though.

They'll probably gain some speed in low/medium speed corners, and lose speed in high speed sections. Although additional active-aero will help some.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Makes sense, since we'll likely see tighter lines taken on corners.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago

Yup. They'll start off much slower but after a few years they'll be rapid again.