this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
149 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

48081 readers
796 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have many nerdy friends who have been Linux users for ages. But most of them don't know such a thing as Openwrt exists or have never bothered to give it a try. It's a very fun piece of software to play with and can be extremely useful for routing traffic. Wondering why it isn't more popular/widely used.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dandroid@sh.itjust.works 41 points 7 months ago

I was actually the lead engineer on an Openwrt router. I hadn't heard of it before that, but at one point I pretty much knew it inside and out. It's been a few years since I left that company, so I'm a bit rusty at this point.

We made tons of custom features for our router. I did the backend and implemented UIs for most of them. The biggest feature I did though was a full REST API to be able to configure the router from a smart home controller, which was the company's main product. I did both the router side (server) and the smart home controller side (client/caller), including the UI on the smart home controller. I spent almost a year on just that feature. But I was damn proud of it by the end.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago

I've been using OpenWRT as a hobbyist for over 15 years, and as a professional for over 6 years. Extremely underrated OS.

A vanilla install beats any stock router firmware by leaps and bounds. From there you can add pretty much any functionality you desire.

I currently use a Turris Omnia router made by CZ.NIC, who also maintains their own OpenWRT based distro called Turris OS.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I've been using it for years and now I basically can't live without it. I consider OpenWrt compatibility in all of my router purchases. Currently using a Netgear R7800 and a Belkin RT3200, both are going strong.

It isn't as widely used because it can be finicky to flash sometimes, and that's if it's even compatible in the first place. Even if it works, you may experience a drop in performance unless OpenWrt supports using the routers hardware acceleration features. If there's no support, OpenWrt basically uses the onboard CPU to do routing and they're usually not all that powerful.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I'm also running a few R7800 with OpenWrt units and they're really nice.

[–] UnityDevice@startrek.website 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

TIL there are Linux people that don't use OpenWRT. I always assumed everyone in the Linux community used it. It's great.

Works great with mt7621 based routers if anyone ends up looking for something compatible.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Some people use pfSense/OPNsense

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I run a proxmox and run PFsense on it. They are both pretty similar but there were more tutorials for PFsense at the time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Past Linux user here, not only do I use openwrt, but I base my routers choice on openwrt support, it's weird to me there are long term Linux users who don't know what openwrt is

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 11 points 7 months ago

I use dd-wrt a little bit, then tomato and variant (usb, toastman, fresh) then Merlin for maybe 5 years now.

Broadcom routers are mostly not openwrt compatible

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

Yup. Running it on my home router, right now. It is awesome. A tiny, stripped down OS that you can install minimal packages on. Like a VPN client, or ad-blockers. If your router is compatible, I cannot suggest it enough.

Also, my router's manufacturer had the gall to ask (force) me to sign up and get an ID with them in order to get to the back-end of my own router. Jesus Christ, privacy red flag much?

I could not install OpenWRT fast enough.

[–] stormio@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago

I use OpenWRT on my Linksys WRT3200ACM because I used to have a cable connection that suffered from bufferbloat. The SQM feature made a huge improvement. I eventually switched to a fiber connection from a different ISP which does not suffer from bufferbloat, but I kept OpenWRT on my router.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I've used OpenWrt, DD-WRT, and Tomato firmware on the various routers I've had. I don't think I've ever kept the stock firmware on any router I've owned.

I use pfSense at home now, but I've been considering switching to OPNsense. I still run OpenWrt on a portable router that I use when I'm traveling though. I won't ever buy a router that I can't run open source firmware on.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

OPNsense is solid too, better than pfsense.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] offspec@lemmy.nicknakin.com 7 points 7 months ago

I actually took some older now somewhat defunct google wifi pucks and got them all set up on openwrt not too long ago. Really enjoy having them on something with a dedicated web UI and perfectly nerdy

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Fine on limited hardware like a router but if you're going to use a full box for your router (or a VM), you'd probably want OPNsense for the ease of management and the fact that it's targetted for hardware like that.

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Installed OpenWRT on my NetGear router like 2 years back, and it didn't give me any trouble since then. BTW, the amount of configuration options it offer is mindbogglingly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShankShill@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

I've used it and dd-wrt back in the day on cheap crashy routers. Also Tomato.

Haven't tried it in a long time, but have an EAP225 v2 and v3 I've been considering slapping openwrt on.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 7 months ago (10 children)

Interesting. I have heard of it but so far I didnt bother since my router is quite versatile.

My biggest fear is that it borks itself and I sit there at 10 pm on movie night without a network or internet to troubleshoot.

If if I chose to use it I would need to have the current router as a fallback either running 24/7 or on a dead man switch.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Some routers have dual partition setup.

Active and backup. When flashing firmware, it is flashed to the backup partition. If the router boots successfully, the newly flashed backup partition becomes active and vice versa. If things screw up, nothing happens.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Thanks for the info. Thats not exactly what I meant. I‘m not afraid of the router itself breaking at installation but freezing for example and not being able to reboot. I usually dont tinker with mission critical stuff.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

been running it for years now, no weird sudden stability problems whatsoever.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago

I know about it but definitely prefer Opnsense for my x86 router.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (8 children)

I mean, what does one have to do to replace an ISP owned router and what are the benefits? How much does one have to know in order to setup a connection? How does one get connection details from the ISP owned router? How much does a replacement router cost?

My ISP owned router allows me to configure NAT forwarding, replace the DNS, setup a DMZ, assign static IPs to MACs, turn off the internet at specific times (e.g at night), configure parental controls (allows websites, internet access) per device, and probably a few other things I haven't discovered yet.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago

If you mean a DSL modem or cable DOCSIS, I don't think those are easily replaceable. But you can definitely put an OpenWRT device right behind it and use that. It's pretty straightforward (plug in the upstream side, wait for it to get an address, done).

As for how much you need to know... okay. That's a tricky question because, the most you mess with OpenWRT, the more some stuff becomes automatic, and that makes it easy to forget things. That's not on you, that's on me.

That said, thinking about it a little, the defaults are pretty workable right after installation. You'll have to set an admin password on the OpenWRT box (it nags you until you do these days), which should be familiar. Turning up wifi is a little tricky at first. I would recommend reading through the quickstart guide once or twice before digging into OpenWRT configuration because it lays out all of the basics that you need to get going. It's about as well written and useful as the manuals for access points were way back when.

One thing I would recommend is, if you build an OpenWRT box, setting it up before you plug it in and use it as your network gateway. It's much easier to poke at it without having "When is my network going to come back up?" rattling around in the back of your mind.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I've known about it for years, but my router is loaned from the ISP so I can't install any custom OS on it (although I've considered buying my own for a while because I can't even do proper DNS for my internal network on it). A while back I used to have a router, but the default OS was enough for my needs so I also never considered installing anything different.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I used to use it, then wanted more control, power, and functionality so I moved to pfSense, and later on to Opnsense where I am today.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 3 points 7 months ago

Made the same journey over the years. Rocking a OPNsense DEC740 now and everything works well.

[–] different_base@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Yes. It saved me from crappy firmware on my expensive router. It's a must if you care about security of your home network and devices.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

No, for home I've only ever used pfsense or opnsense.

[–] nixx@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

About a million years ago, back in 2007/2008 that is, there was this small company called Hexago that did R&D in IPv6 networking, they were behind the Frenet6 project and created the networking stack and the TSP client that would let you tunnel a /56 IPv6 network over a dynamic IPv4 connection.

One the projects was a tiny hardware router, I honestly forget who made it, but Hexago would buy them, then we would flash each one with WRT+TSP client custom image, the idea was you plug this in your network and you have IPv6 connection in your network without doing any magic configuration.

It worked well until we lost finding.

So yeah, OpenWRT is old and not just for Linksys routers :)

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I do know about it, but I don't even have internet at home.
Though I do use DD-WRT on my WRT160NL which I use at school. For me it acts as firewall + setup-free VPN + DNS Ad blocker (NextDNS). I also have separate passwordless guest network on it if someone wants to use my router. Separate subnet, unbridged with net isolation and AP isolation enabled. And also QoS set to "Bulk" while my network is set to "Maximum". And also forced DNS redirection enabled, so that everyone who doesn't use DoT or DoH uses NextDNS.

It cannot run modern versions of OpenWRT.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sepi@piefed.social 4 points 7 months ago

As a person with hands, do you know about flamenco?

[–] Kazumara@feddit.de 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah of course! Once I went on a buying spree of used WNDR3700. They were so cheap and I won a few too many bids at once.

I gave one to a flatmate when we lived together as students and he took it with when he moved out. Put one in the office room of my current flatmate and still have one or two in reserve. I usually take one with me to LAN-parties.

Before that I once used DD-WRT on a WRT54GL. It also wasn't bad from what I remember.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I run it on a cheap asus router. Learned stuff like don't run adguard on it if you don't have that much ram

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

As a seven-plus year Linux vet I've known about OpenWRT for some time but only made the switch about 3 months or so myself to breathe some life into an aging Linksys.

I'm very impressed with the kit so far, it runs well (snappy even) and the amount of options provided are a bit overwhelming at first. Eventually I'll move on to prosumer hardware, but this is a nice middle ground in the interim.

[–] wolf@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

I used it in the past, and it is great.

Nowadays, I bought a mid price router from a well known brand, and seriously: The router works, has all features I need (even WireGuard OOTB) and for now I see no reason to replace the provided firmware with OpenWRT. YOLO!

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

I used OpenWRT for years, but I switched to the FreeBSD-based OPNSense router/firewall OS.

load more comments
view more: next ›