this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
436 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59243 readers
3428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 177 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If only all these tracking functions were easy to deactivate (or better, opt-in) then there would not be a need for jammers

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 128 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They should 100% be opt in. If I want to use GPS I’ll use my phone. I don’t know a single person that uses the one built into the car.

But obviously they want all that juicy data. It’s not enough that they charge insane rates on the vehicles themselves, they must also add microtransactions and track when we have sex, and with who too.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

everything like this should be Opt-In.

It should be a violation of our basic civil and human rights for this shit to be opt-out, especially in such a way that you are not even aware of it, or the ability to opt out.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I would say depends. For company owned cars thats justified as it should purely meant for business trip only. For duel use vehicle, that there should absolutely have switch to turn it on or off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WallEx@feddit.de 108 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So they should also make it legal to rip that shit out or force the automakers to give customers that option.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 67 points 8 months ago (6 children)

The article is talking about lorry drivers making trips for work though. I am not sure I understand the need for the drivers to conceal their location while they work?

But otherwise I agree.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago

Potentially to skirt driving time limits?

Many lorry drivers are paid by the trip. If they get stuck in traffic, they are losing money. They are also required to take regular breaks, to avoid fatigue. If they jammed the GPS, then the company can't prove they didn't take their break, and worked through, to make up time.

It also allows for disallowed detours. "Sorry boss, I was stuck in traffic for over an hour". In fact they went for a pub lunch, on the clock.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hm yeah in a working context its different, but still, why would they need to be tracked, other then MAYBE logistics (which lorry drivers would be), so yeah, gets muddy

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Some insurance companies require tracking devices on commercial accounts. One of my clients it's required to use them as part of their policy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This article centers on those driving work vehicles that their employer has installed trackers on. I know recently auto makers have been found snooping, which I don't even have words for, but this isn't that.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 6 points 8 months ago

Yeah, looks like I misinterpreted a bit

[–] Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

You know what feels wrong? You can easily buy GPS tracking devices on Amazon, but it is illegal to use a GPS jammer in USA, Canada and many other countries.

So companies spying you is fine, but blocking a GPS signal to prevent them from spying can get you a $16,000 fine.

Edit: my thought experiment is not about truck drivers being monitored but more about those fancy new EVs that sell your GPS based data to data brokers... You usually can't turn off the GPS in those EVs.

[–] flawedFraction@lemmy.world 71 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The reason this needs to be illegal is because jamming the signal is not specific to you. You block your signal but you probably will also be blocking it for anyone else in the vicinity. Plus the way these things work they can create interference for other types of signals as well. It isn't the blocking itself that's illegal, but the interference that you're causing.

[–] Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I totally understand this and I agree when it comes to jammers this powerful.

My comment was about the low power models which only works for few feet, just enough for to cover your own car. Those are still illegal.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My comment was about the low power models which only works for few feet

There's no such thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

GPS signals are incredibly weak and super vulnerable to interference.

We all deserve the right not to be tracked.

The solution to this isn't in GPS jamming the solution to this is in data collection laws. They should absolutely refuse to sell cars that don't have the option to turn off cellular links and GPS tracking.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm no GPSjamologist, but if a jammer was running in your car, wouldn't the signal reach other nearby cars while in traffic or does it do it all within the confines of your automobile?

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That is exactly why this is illegal. These things can have a range of up to hundreds of meters and thus you're affecting other people aswell and not just yourself.

[–] Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

From the low power models I've seen (which are still very much illegal, same as the most powerful ones) only work between 5 to 10 feet at the very most.

It's like when the companies place trackers in cars, we have to assume they have the best intentions in mind (it is definitely for the customers security right?!)

But if we, the customers, block them from tracking us by jamming the GPS signal, they assume we have the worst intentions in mind (surely we are dirty criminals right?!)

This is why I said it "feels" wrong.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It doesn't work like that.

They broadcast a powerful radio signal on the GPS frequency. You might have to be within 10 feet for it to completely drown out the real GPS frequency, but the waves don't stop they just spread out and get "thinner" with distance. If it completely blocks the signal at 10 feet, it will severely reduce accuracy further out than that. Likely everyone within line of sight of your car will lose accuracy on their GPS.

And that would include airplanes, line of sight is a really long distance up above your car. Airplanes use GPS for critical functions including making sure they don't crash into the ground when they're flying through clouds / rain / fog so you could potentially cause serious problems. Most likely force the airplane to land in a different city — because they will not land if their altitude equipment isn't working... yes they have other ways of measuring altitude but all of them are unreliable, which is why they have GPS. You're taking away one layer of their patchwork system of landing safely and if too many layers are gone then they abandon the landing and fly elsewhere - happened to a friend of mine recently, turned a quick 2 hour flight home into an 18 hour trip.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

This person jamologises GPSs on the regular.

And yes, I doubt any county would fine you for jamming completely exclusivity (and exactly) only your antenna. It wouldn't even be detectable.

[–] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Active jamming is illegal but passive is not. You can block yourself but not others. FYI.

[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tape some foil over the GPS antenna.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zik@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's not just EVs - most new cars have these tracking devices where they sell your data to your insurance company to be used against you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Just wait until your smart toilet can tell the insurance companies what chemical substances you've consumed so that the can raise your rates, deny your claims, or sell the info to your boss so the company can fire you with cause.

We already live in hell and there's no upper limit on the thermostat.

[–] elwy@fedit.io 6 points 8 months ago

We already live in hell and there's no upper limit on the thermostat.

Well actually there is because the smart thermostats are getting remotely limited by power companies sometimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago

Let me preface this by saying I completely agree that there’s a conflict here, but it’s pretty much required in this day and age.

Let’s look at the current situation: Someone buys a tracker for under $100, sticks it to your car, and they can see you wherever you go. It’s scary, because they can know where you are at all times, and there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to figure out who did it.

Now an alternative where GPS trackers are illegal: Someone buys the generic parts for a GPS tracker, sticks it to your car, and they can see you wherever you go. But also legitimate uses for GPS trackers aren’t possible any longer. Say goodbye to things like tiles and air tags, hell maybe even GPS in your phone since you can get an android device with GPS for less than $100 and load it with software to do the tracking. At best you’ve prevented easy tracking with a huge detriment to the average user, at worst you’ve outlawed GPS tech entirely.

The final alternative is allowing jamming. I don’t have a nice story for this one, because the implications are far reaching. Is your jammer too strong? You’re interrupting other people’s GPS in a huge area, including things like navigation, child/pet/item tracking, time sensitive hardware could be using GPS as well, or things checking elevation. Not to mention, jammers can be used for nefarious purposes as well. Kidnapping a child and jamming a tracker on them, stealing a phone/wallet/keys and blocking its ability to report where it is.

There’s no perfect situation here, but the current state is the least harmful to the general population.

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 58 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Vehicle telematics is the next frontier of the cyberpunk privacy dystopia. I hope more people start using these things.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

you make that comment, in a week where we have had a megacorp public assassination of a whistleblower and cypherpunk crypto money has risen to a record high value versus government money?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 46 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"There's only one nationality who would dare give us the raspberry! FINNS!"

[–] TarantulaFudge@startrek.website 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I would use one for privacy but there would be black vans following me around and probably land a felony. It is really easy to track these things. All they have to do is look for big blob of gps unavailable bubble moving around and they can also triangulate the signal with fairly cheap tools. Jamming is just spamming noise after all.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Never fuck with the FCC (or relevant agency in your country)

[–] Senal@programming.dev 11 points 8 months ago

Unless you're a big corp, then fuck with impunity but make sure to pay the "cost of doing business" tax.

If the tax is too high, just buy some lobbyists or political system equivalent.

[–] Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes and there was an article few months ago telling that burglars now use wifi jammers to turn off wifi security cameras before breaking and entering. Those jammers are pretty much illegal as well but criminal do illegal stuff anyways...

That being said, how would blocking only the GPS help criminals in their criminal activities? I lack imagination I guess.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Your phone or car saying you were near the scene of a crime when it occurred. Your phone or car showing that you regularly cross paths with a person of interest. Jammer would keep those devices from rating you out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Fucking greedy corps.. 🖕🖕

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Gonna start a business for car wraps with integrated faraday cages

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

Until someone just sticks a transmitter on the outside of the wrap.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I think you could do it, but you'd need to spray some foam or something so the wrap cage isn't touching any metal of the car.

Might be easier to just put a cage around the transmitter.

[–] MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If you can find the transmitter, that is. I think that's the problem

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Johanno@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

So professional drivers, watched by their employer, are using those to escape the control.

Even if they allow them to disable the GPS, it would be a reason for firing smb. Or to cut their wage since, drivers with GPS on will get a bonus if they are faster. Or sth shit like that.

[–] muse@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have never seen smb short for somebody, and spent far too long reading that as "shake my butt" in the same connotation as smh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 7 points 8 months ago (6 children)

It's illegal to spy on your workers through a camera in most EU countries. Why should GPS tracking be legal?

[–] kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A camera and GPS are two very different technologies with distinct capabilities that do not overlap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is a safety thing. There are laws about how long you can drive without breaks because tired truckers kill people in accidents. They can't force a driver to actually rest when stopped, but if there's no law, then you know they'll never rest. I would agree if this was simply active monitoring of location on a company sedan, but it's different when the job is specifically driving for long periods

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tissek@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

It can also tie into mandatary rests, that the vehicle has to be stationary. And that is good thing as it makes it harder for emplyers to exploit their drivers.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›