this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
491 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 102 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Give me a small 4dr sedan with crank windows, manual mirrors, pleather seats, tape player, shitty heat/ac, room for just 4 ppl (barely) and electric for $12-15k. They will fly off the shelves.

Instead let's build 7 passenger SUVs with a massive ass IPad, that drives itself into other cars, and fetch key fobs.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's due to battery prices. You can't pay $25,000 for a battery, put it in a shitbox and sell it for $30,000 because nobody's going to buy a $30,000 car with the features and quality of a $5,000 car. Batteries can only be maybe a third of the cost of a car, so everyone's been targeting the top of the market with expensive EVs.

The good news is, battery prices are continuing to plummet each year. When you have $2,000 batteries, $12,000 cars are doable.

[–] Chriswild@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bullshit. You can easily get a battery for less than $25,000. The Tesla model 3 is a 50KWh pack and is $14000 to replace and likely costs way less to make.

If you were really skilled you could buy 50KWh worth of cells for less than $10000.

The reason the batteries are more is because you have SUVs and Trucks that need twice the amount of cells for about the same range because they're not aerodynamic

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

The math still stands even with those numbers

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Give me a small 4dr sedan with crank windows, manual mirrors, pleather seats, tape player, shitty heat/ac, room for just 4 ppl (barely) and electric for $12-15k. They will fly off the shelves.

I don't think they will though. At least in the US. I currently drive the gas version of this vehicle, a 5 speed Ford Fiesta, and the majority of other drivers on the road seem offended that I'm there with them. I set my cruise control ~7mph over the speed limit everywhere I go (almost all highway driving) and I'll have people speed up when I switch lanes to go around them because they had been driving slower than me for miles previously. I'm used to seeing nothing but bro-dozer oversized grills out of my rear hatch window. Police could just use me as a mobile speed trap for all the people who feel the need to zoom around me despite always going just below the 'probably won't get pulled over' speed. When I'm turning left at a light and I need to end up in the right-most lane I have to switch quickly to keep the person behind me from flooring it and trying to go around me in the slow lane.

Meanwhile I have low cost to replace tires, low insurance rates and get 40mpg regardless of how or where I drive it.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I definitely understand. In North Carolina we have Carolina lifted trucks. It's were the back of the truck is lower than the front. Illegal? Yes. Enforced? No. A real child plowing machine (never thought I would have to write that statement before).

There is a sect of the population that needs to grow the fuck up and stop worrying about their dick size or how tall they are. We need to have a more realistic view when buying things. Do I need a $100k truck with mud tires and a 12" lift just to pick up the kids from daycare and get groceries? No

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's amazing how much a difference there was in road manners when I was driving a mustang vs. a rav4. It was quite literally stress free, suddenly there were no jackasses on the road.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Try driving an old crown Vic police cruiser. The last one was made in 2011 and were never ever used in my area. I still get people getting over and slowing down when they were going to pass me.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Oh, same. We have multiple vehicles and I only experience this when driving the Fiesta. It's almost like people are mad that you have chosen a vehicle based on logic and reasoning over id.

Also, in my town at least, this phenomenon seems to have gotten perceptibly worse over the past 6-8 years. People are just angrier all the time in general I think.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I understand all those requirements except the tape player. I don't why anyone would need that? In fact they'd probably just add additional cost as I imagine getting brand new tape decks would be hard to source now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nikscha@feddit.de 44 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

I often hear people saying "But where does the electricity for the EV come from? Driving an EV is not better than driving a diesel."

They have to realize that the thiny ICE in your car is optimised for weight, and has an efficiency of 30-35%. So about ⅔ of the fossil fuel is turned into heat and blown out of the exhaust. Compare that to the turbine in a coal or gas plant, which can archive up to 90% efficiency.

And don't forget that an EV is an investment, which will likely still be on the road in 20 years time. The electricity mix at the moment is still rather fossil fuel heavy, but this will change completely within the next 10 years.

Edit: not 90% but 40% efficiency. See comments below

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Compare that to the turbine in a coal or gas plant, which can archive up to 90% efficiency.

Nope, you might have seen 90+% efficiency when talking about steam power plants, but that's the efficiency of the generator(converting the mechanical energy of the the rotating turbogenerator to electricity). You have to multiply with the efficiency of the turbine(converting the energy of the heated gases into the mechanical energy) and there the efficiency is much lower, ~40% for a coal fired and maybe <60% for a gas combined cycle.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Yeah. Power plants are nowhere near 90% efficient.

It's worth emphasizing, though, that they're still way, way more efficient than car engines are.

Also, regenerative breaking saves a lot of energy. Basically, instead of using the motor to increase the cars speed, you use it as a generator to recharge the battery.

[–] nikscha@feddit.de 6 points 8 months ago

Huh, that makes a lot of sense actually. Thanks for correcting!

If nothing else, electricity is fungible by source. Your EV doesn't care if the electrons in your battery came from solar, coal, fusion, whatever. An ICE? It can burn certain hydrocarbons. That's it.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 14 points 8 months ago

Not to mention that a grid doesn't have to be a coal or gas plant. Lots of houses have solar charging now, for example.

[–] TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Last time I looked (a few years ago), a 100% coal powered EV had similar emissions to a 60mpg car.

I doubt anywhere will still be coal powered in a decade, with how fast plants are closing. But that EV will still be there on its 3rd owner.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Different countries and states obviously have different electricity source mixes.

Here in the UK, coal accounts for around 1% of electricity. Natural gas is about 35%, biomass about 5%, and the rest is various clean renewables (wind, solar, hydro) or nuclear.

So although charging an EV is by no means fossil-fuel-free, it's considerably less fossil-fuel than an ICE car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We’ve contributed to that. We got a PHEV (not a pure electric) that we probably put gas in once a month whereas before it was probably every 2 weeks to 10 days in a normal car.

EVs are awesome.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Got myself a fully electric car, and yeah... Never looking back. I keep it charged for maybe five bucks a month most of the time, with the only exceptions being when I'm taking it on a longer trip. It gets 250 miles per charge on average, which is plenty as far as I'm concerned. Charging on the go is more expensive of course, but still a lot cheaper than filling a gas tank.

[–] eltrain123@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’ve had mine for 4 years. A few months back I started traveling with it. I average about 230-250 miles per charge for around 15-18$. That’s a charge every 3.5 hours or so. Sometimes, you can find hotels that let you charge for free overnight, too.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's the best. I went to a sporting event last year and parked a couple blocks from the arena. The cost to charge and park was less than parking at the closest parking garage.

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 30 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Doesn't less demand mean cheaper gas? That sure hasn't happened here.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

Maybe it didn't go up as fast because of it

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Less supply does the opposite

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you're in America, wait until closer to the election

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

Haha less demand means "refinery upgrades".

[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

For many people they actually represent a better experience. If you mostly use the car below the range of the battery in your local area and can charge at home then you mostly eliminate the need to travel to fill up stations. Its kind of nice to not have to put petrol into the vehicle every week and have to deal with it being near empty and being forced to refill. It just gets charged cheaply overnight on greener power.

The modern EVs get a lot of range in a 15-30 minute charge too. The reality is a 250 mile EV requires one stop to drive for 8-10 hours. Most people aren't going to do that without a break in the middle. Even if you were going to go non-stop compared to an ICE its only another 30 minutes of journey time extra and it will cost you less to do it. So long as there are enough charge points, and these days their typically are in a lot of countries, then its not really a massive problem.

In many ways they are more convenient on most peoples average usage and the range anxiety goes away when you realise what we are really talking about in terms of long journeys and how long charging in practice will add.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

Dude you've got the numbers completely wrong. I drive a "modern ev with a 250mile range" and in reality I will stop after 2-3 hours when doing long trips in the winter.

Manufacturer stated EV range is a joke. 5-6 hours of driving at best with one stop, not 8-10 lol.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

How many EVs will it take for fuel prices to start decreasing? Or do prices only react to increased demand 🙃

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago (3 children)

They'll lower production to introduce artificial scarcity.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 29 points 8 months ago

Which is amazing news for the planet, they're greedy though so they'll probably try and keep it cheap enough to keep people using and maximize profit.

It's going to be interesting when a large enough portion of cars on the road are electric that gas stations start to lose enough business to thin out.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago

They'll lower production to introduce artificial scarcity.

Just like they have done many times in the past.

[–] gorgori@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

That's why we need to hit peak oil fast. It will be a definitive fuck you to oil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrSilkworm@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The increase in energy consumption globally is still bigger than the increase of energy production from renewables. When this happens, hopefully soon, we will start seing reductions in fossil fuel, and especially oil, cosumption. The adoption of EVs will increase further as soon as bettery cosy falls further, wich is expected in the next few years due to increased supply of lithium and thecnologiasl breakthroughs in EV energy mangement

Lets cross our fingers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›